Subject: Re: Mars Meteorite ALH84001 Contained Numerous Blood Vessels
From: Wretch Fossil
Date: 13/11/2011, 05:33
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.sci.seti,sci.med

On 10月24日, 下午9時42分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10月23日, 下午7時03分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:









On 10月23日, 上午12時10分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Allen Treiman displayed a micrograph ofmeteoriteALH 84001 athttp://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/marslife/slide_22.html

I foundnumerousbloodveselremainsin the image and labelled them inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1782866539&p=67

The above is negative effect of this photo:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=29&f=1782866538&p=66

Reasons why they werebloodvessels (added on Oct. 23, 2011):

1. No minerals curve and contain bulging dots in structures smaller
than 10 micrometers in diameter. Asbestos’ fibers are no larger than
one micrometer across. Asbestos don’t contain bulging dots in their
fibers or in bundles of fibers.
2. No bacteria or fungi or plant rootlets have so many minute
branches
(<4 micrometers across) in such small area.
3. No animal cells or tissues have such minute (<4 microns across)
branches bulging with round dots, exceptbloodvessels and lymph
vessels. However, lymph vessels should be connected to lymph nodes,
which are not seen in the image.

So,bloodvessels were the only real possibility.

A list of my postshttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Edited on Oct. 24, 2011: Reasons why they werebloodvessels.

1.No minerals possess the shape and size of the “bloodvesselremains”, which branch, curve,contain bulging dots, and measure around
two micrometers in diameter.

2.No bacteria or fungi or plant rootlets have so many minute branches
(~2 micrometers across) in such small areas.

3.No animal cells or tissues have such minute (~2 microns across)
branches bulging with round dots, exceptbloodvessels and lymph
vessels. Lymph vessels should be connected to lymph nodes, which are
not seen in the image.

So,bloodvessels were the only real possibility.

A list of my posts:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Edited on Nov. 13, 2011:

Why they were blood vessels:
0. Because they resemble the shapes of blood vessels shown in the
following micrographs:
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/RT2002/images/6712parsons-f4.gif
http://adsoftheworld.com/files/images/Asics1.jpg
http://www.bordalierinstitute.com/images/bloodVessel.jpg
     They also meet the sizes of blood vessels, which range from
three
     micrometers to over10,000 micrometers.

Other points remain the same.