t e m p o r a l 
 d o o r w a y 

3/30-31/90 - near Wavre, Belgium, police officers, ground-based and airborne radar detection

 
Report Summary 3/30


23:00 - A call from a gendarme is recieved by the Glons CRC (Control Reporting Center); 3 unusual lights are under observation, constantly changing color, in the shape of an equilateral triangle.

23:10 - A second formation moves toward the first. Glons CRC has an unidentified radar contact at 5 km N of Beuvechain Airport, speed 25 knots.

23:45 - After a series of erratic movements, the second formation forms a triangle similar to the first. Glons CRC confirm unidentified radar contacts at the correct location. Semmerzake TCC / RP (Traffic Control Center / Reporting Post) confirms radar contact.

23:56 - Glons CRC scrambles 1 J Wing.


3/31

0:05 - Two F16s depart for the ninth interception attempt. Previous attempts have failed to maintain radar lock.

0:13 - First lock on (see graph below).

0:19 - Semmerzake and Glons lose contact with the target.

0:30 - Fighter AL-17 has a radar contact; lock-on lasts for 6 seconds and is then broken with a jamming indicator shown on the on-board radarscope; speed 740 knots. Ground witnesses see the F-16s pass through the center of the first formation. The second formation disperses - one point goes up - the others disappear.

0:32 - Glons and Semmerzake both detect a a high speed contact 6 nm from Beauvechain. Speeds are 478-690 knots.

0:47 - Beauvechain RAPCON watches a contact on its scope for 9 mins, confirmed by Glons radar. Further attempts at interception fail. Ground observers see the last of the phenomenon disappear in the NNW.[footnote 1]
Hynek Classification RV
Original Vallee Classification Type IVb
Current Vallee Classification MA1
Minimum Distance 5-6 nm
Object Appearance Triangular formations of erratically moving lights which later disperse.
Object Behavior Performance of UFO based on radar track
Physical Effect None
Medical Effect None
Comments / Conclusion The performance shown on the graph is one which has some strong correlations. Note how speed increases as the UFO dives. Note also how the UFO maintains speed during its ascent. Several manuvers are combined - increase in speed, altitude gain, and turning.
This graph is similar to one obtained from a US radar contact, shown in one of Vallee's earlier books.

Performance Data

Here is the performance data used in the graph[footnote 2]:

Seconds from lock Heading (degrees) Speed (knots) Altitude (feet)
1 200 150 7000
2 200 150 7000
3 200 150 7000
4 200 150 7000
5 200 150 6000
6 270 560 6000
7 270 560 6000
8 270 570 6000
9 270 560 6000
10 270 550 7000
11 210 560 9000
12 210 570 10000
13 210 560 11000
14 210 570 10000
15 270 770 7000
16 270 770 6000
17 270 780 6000
18 270 790 5000
19 290 1010 4000
20 290 1000 3000
21 290 990 2000
22 290 990 1000
23 300 990 0
24 300 980 0

Footnotes

1. UFO: A Deadly Concealment, Sheffield, ISBN 0-7137-2620-2, p 22

2. UFO: A Deadly Concealment, Sheffield, ISBN 0-7137-2620-2, p 22

Copyright © 2004 by Mark Cashman (unless otherwise indicated), All Rights Reserved