For more recent information about Area 51, see the new Area 51 Research Center maintained by Don Emory.
|
From: BaDge <baj7d@avery.med.virginia.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 22:48:51 -0800 |
Hi, Boy, the list has been slow, lately! Did everyone see the letter to the editors that Phil Klass sent to the Washington Post? =========== Wednesday, August 27, 1997; Page A18 The Washington Post The Post's Aug. 8 editorial "The Summer of UFOs" falsely implies that I fully endorse a recent CIA historian's report that prompted The Post's Aug. 5 news story "Cold War UFO Coverup Shielded Spy Planes." In fact, in the letter to the editor I submitted on Aug. 6 (which was not published), I sharply challenged the claim made in the article that "the Air Force and CIA willfully misled the public by claiming that thousands [my emphasis] of [UFO] sightings were caused by ice crystals, temperature inversions and other tricks of nature, when in fact they were produced by flights of high-flying super-secret [U-2, SR-71] spy planes." My letter, based on data available for more than 30 years, revealed that during the mid to late 1950s, when the U-2's existence and covert mission were under wraps, and during the early 1960s, when the SR-71 was under wraps, the Air Force explained only 59 UFO reports as "mirages and inversions" or "clouds and contrails" -- not "thousands." If the Air Force knew that a UFO report had been generated by a covert U-2 or SR-71 flight, it could simply list it as "unidentified" -- i.e., unexplained. During this same nine-year period, the Air Force characterized 136 UFO reports as "unidentified." ============ I have to agree with him, why would the AF do other than just say 'unident'? Seems to me the historian has some bats in his belfry to have submitted the Aug 5th story anyway, since it can't possibly be accurate. regards, _____ BaDge <baj7d@virginia.edu>
Index: CIA and UFOs
|
Created: Aug 30, 1997