Lazar's Back Engineering: A Fallacy, Part II

From: Ken MacGray 
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 97 07:21:42 -0500
Subject: Lazar's Back Engineering: A Fallacy, Part II

(The luminescent Hular pipes up in a.c.a51 on a recent article that I
reposted to the list...  -Ken)

===============

From: gufon@ix.netcom.com(Gene Huff)
Newsgroups:
alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.conspiracy.area51
,alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Re: LAZAR'S BACK-ENGINEERING - A FALLACY
Date: 4 Feb 1997 00:55:40 GMT

In <5d53qg$9ih@tofu.alt.net> bee@sfu.ca (Jeremy Bee) writes:

>Also the "reactor" in the middle contains a very
>few simple parts, hardly likely to reveal much of anything without
>destructive testing.

-For the first time ever, Jeremy, you're right. If you knew the Lazar
story you'd know that he was brought into the program because a couple
of men were killed after sawing through a reactor with a plasma cutter
type device.-

>Of course there is the added problem that if we believe in Roswell
>(which is the foundation on which the Lazar Myth is built), your
>typical Flying Saucer parts are basically indestructable.

-Back to your normal self. Lazar's story has nothing to do with Roswell
as Lazar did not work on crash retrievals. That is the true myth.

This is almost a reasonable conversation and I wish I wasn't leaving so
I could pursue it. (I don't have a lap top) It's interesting that none
of you are familiar enough with the Lazar story to know that it's not
based on crash retrievals or back engineering from square one. If
intelligent, reasonable people (unlike those usually found here) are
going to discuss the pros and cons, it might help if you knew the story
first so you knew what to consider.-

===============

From: thx1138@ix.netcom.com (Michael Hofmeister)
Newsgroups:
alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.conspiracy.area51
,alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Re: LAZAR'S BACK-ENGINEERING - A FALLACY
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 07:20:28 GMT

On 4 Feb 1997 00:45:16 GMT, in <5d60qs$fn5@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,
gufon@ix.netcom.com(Gene Huff) wrote:

>Lazar's story isn't based on back-engineering these discs from square
>one. When the hardware was first presented there was a measure of
>instruction with them from the ETs. They found those at S4, or wherever
>this happened

Yeah, right, "wherever."  Cover your butt in case you need to change your
story. Again.

>at that point in time, to be insufferable students and

Uh huh.  Those MIT saucer reverse engineers must have been shooting spit
wads through straws at the greys when they turned their backs.  And we
have
the nerve to call ourselves civilized....

>left in a huff and left some of the hardware.

I guess the Intergalactic Cruiser Mothership garage was full or their
inventory control needs major work or the assets had zero book value or...

>This allegedly happened
>in the late 70s. You needn't worry about the PC being dropped to
>simulate a crashed disc as the Lazar info is not, and has never been,
>based on crash retrievals.-

That wouldn't make sense then, would it?  That would be like trying to
drive a '56 Buick that hit a brick wall doing 70,000 mph.

--

Michael Hofmeister

===============

From: thx1138@ix.netcom.com (Michael Hofmeister)
Newsgroups:
alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.conspiracy.area51
,alt.mindcontrol
Subject: Re: LAZAR'S BACK-ENGINEERING - A FALLACY
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 07:20:33 GMT

On 4 Feb 1997 00:55:40 GMT, in <5d61ec$2gj@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>,
gufon@ix.netcom.com(Gene Huff) wrote:

>In <5d53qg$9ih@tofu.alt.net> bee@sfu.ca (Jeremy Bee) writes:
->>
>Also the "reactor" in the middle contains a very
>few simple parts, hardly likely to reveal much of anything without
>destructive testing.

>-For the first time ever, Jeremy, you're right. If you knew the Lazar
>story you'd know that he was brought into the program because a couple
>of men were killed after sawing through a reactor with a plasma cutter
>type device.-

They should have used a diamond blade Mikita radial wet saw.  That puppy
will cut through just about anything.

>It's interesting that none
>of you are familiar enough with the Lazar story to know that it's not
>based on crash retrievals or back engineering from square one.

Right.  Lazar claims the greys tried to give us a Berlitz class in Saucer
Fundamentals 101, but we humans had neglected to take the pre-requisite
hyperdimensional quantum gravity mechanics courses.  So we did poorly on
the mid-term and flunked the final.  They left before collecting the
self-addressed stamped post card for our grade.  When they come back
they'll be pissed.

>If
>intelligent, reasonable people (unlike those usually found here)

Gene - Stop slamming the reality challenged SaucerZealots so hard.
They'll
be the first (and maybe only) ones in line for "The Bob Lazar Story - Now
the Truth Can be Told."  Soon (maybe real soon) to be on video.

>are
>going to discuss the pros and cons, it might help if you knew the story
>first so you knew what to consider.-

Which version are you parading here now?

The one Tim Good wrote that you/Lazar had to disown?

Or is there another one we can all enjoy in mirth filled fantasy?


--

Michael Hofmeister




- Ken MacGray

 ----------========= Virtual Village BBS =========----------
info@vvcs.com - Area 51 Images, Lore, News - www.vvcs.com/a51