Area 51 Makes NASA Look Bad

From: Ken MacGray 
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 97 21:51:48 -0500
Subject: Area 51 Makes NASA Look Bad

(Forwarded from a.c.a51...  -Ken)

==================

From: mike@tristox.com (Michael DeMutis)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51
Subject: AREA 51 Research Makes NASA Redundant - Comments?
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:46:31 GMT

I just finished watching the TLC special on Area-51.     This one guy
claims that the USAF is "BACK-ENGINEERING" (The correct term is
Reverse-Engineering) downed Alien ships.

If this is the case and they have created such things, then what is
the point of NASA.    Why would the government continue to spend
billions of dollars for NASA to do this 20th Century crap when they
have better technology in Nevada?

This is what I don't get.

If the technology they are back-engineering is from an alien
spacecraft, then it is safe to assume that these space-craft are able
to fly in space.

Yet the testing that is apparently going on is for air based crafts.

I think the public is somewhat overly hung-up on the alien theory and
does not want to believe that Area-51 is just a place where the
government tests out & develops new aircraft technology.  We all know
that the Stealth was a product of this.

It all comes back to the same theory, that humans could not have come
up with these technologies... which I don't believe.   Humans are
pretty smart.

Label me a skeptic if you wish.  I'm planning a trip out to Area 51
this summer.   I want to see what I've been reading about.

Michael DeMutis
mike@tristo.com
MailSpam Protected - Correct domain is tristo.com for email.


-------------
Virtual Village Communication Services
Website Development & Design
Clinton, Massachusetts
info@vvcs.com - www.vvcs.com
FirstClass BBS: 508-368-4222
Member Wachusett Chamber of Commerce

Area51Web: www.vvcs.com/a51
Clinton Online: www.vvcs.com/clinton