Laurance Rockefeller and Sean Morton

From: CloudRider@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 13:56:17 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Rockefeller's comment on "population" & global "Plan"

From: Dick Farley  <cloudrider@aol.com>  (Various issues.)
Rockefeller Foundation and David Rockefeller's comments follow this
commentary. Relevance: Laurance Rockefeller (David's brother); "UFOs"; "alien
abduction"; MIT Conference. Sean David Morton and "UFOlogical prophesies."
Globalism.

(Note: While this following report reflects the gilded "front" of
Rockefellerian "applied philosophies" dating from their parents' "eugenics"
and "human herd management,"has been funded by Rockefellerians in pre-WWII
days, both in the U. S. and in Weimar Germany... those who are familiar with
issues in the so-called "UFO" and "paranormal" theatres, where more bizarre
Rockefellerian interests have played so much of a role recently, may be
interested in the perspective public statements such as the following play in
that family's abilities to manage news and government oversight beyond
"cursory."

  Thus, erstwhile "UFO personality" and "millenialist" Sean David
Morton...who later did some "interpretive work" with the "Gulf Breeze Six"
American military personnel who went AWOL and ended up at Gulf Breeze to
await Jesus and do other biddings of their Ouija board "revelations,"  has
commented about allegations of "Rockefellerian" motivations.

   Without giving disinformationist Morton any actual credence beyond what
he's "earned" with his early work associated with Linda Moulton Howe (on
"Sightings"), and as a self-proclaimed "prophet" who also claimed publicly
that his (Morton's) father was a "former Navy test pilot who flew at 'Area
51',"... and that he (Morton) was as a youngster a hanger-on at NASA's
Johnson Spaceflight Center, where his Dad had allegedly become part of the
NASA "PR" machinery ... your attention is drawn to two books Morton published
and sold at some "UFO" conventions, including the Los Angeles "Whole Life
Expo" in 1993, and Timothy Green Beckley's Phoenix-based "Aliens &
Conspiracies" confab, also in 1993, where Morton spoke and was "blessed" by
John Lear and other "seeders" of various "UFO" counter-fables.

  Morton's pages alleged, explicitly, that "...the Rockefellers caused AIDS"
to be created and disseminated. While we have no direct information that such
is the case, philosophically it is clear from their history that the
Rockefeller's believe (and NOT for the gilded reasoning the following
carries), that the human herd is growing in the "wrong" directions. Of
course, Morton also gave during his "workshop" a perspective of the global
financial picture...following the then-recent death of the Baron Rothschild,
which Morton said triggered clandestine planetary power-struggles for control
of "$43 trillion of global resources."

  The subsequent (and more recent) "apparent suicide" of a very depressed
younger Baron Rothschild, did not hurt Morton "prophesies" and his
credibiltiy with his followers, the most notable of whom is of course
himself. But keeping open minds about Morton...who undoubtedly has been
victimized at some stage in his development, unless he is a truly
accomplished actor who merits a shot at the big-time..."facts ARE facts." In
the wake of the Cold War's "ending," the forces of Good and Evil are
repositioning...just as they did at the close of World War II.

  Remember...it was a devastated Germany which surrendered, NOT the Nazi's
and inheritors of Hitler's "New Age" philosophy. Others following "them" more
closely have made excellent cases that "they" are still around, and have
grown in influence, while bettering "their" camouflage. New York, Washington,
and Geneva are effective hiding places for those "possessed" by the same Dark
Spirits who brought about the "soul sacrifice" that our parents experienced
globally now half a century behind us.

   Laurance Rockefeller and Prince Hans Adam of Liechtenstein (a Swiss-German
guy, who funded the "Fund for UFO Research's" video, "Witnesses to Roswell"
as well as part of the MIT "Abductions" conference and the 1992 "T. R. E. A.
T." conference where "alien abductions" were the focus, as well, might then
be questioned as to how their "UFOlogical" interests may (or may not) have
any linkages to their beliefs and desire to take action in coping with
Earth's alleged "eco-catastrophies."

  "Aliens" (whether "real" or fabricated) do indeed seem bent on exerting
influence globally, with their "terrestrial envoys" among the billionaires
and the deluded as their intermediaries.
Hitler seemd crazy beyond any potential for success to those in power before
his ascendancy. It was their laxity that caused it.

  At other places in Sean David Morton's published ruminations are the echos
of Norio Hayakawa's 1993 assertions that in 1997 we would see a "staged UFO
landing," either with bogus aliens created and pumped out publicly by the
"Internationalistas," (after their own media campaigns and targeted
"bombings" and terrorist acts, to "marginalize" and create hostilities toward
any of the self-described "patriot" or "militia" movements, whose
intelligence might have learned of these alleged "plots," so as to forestall
serious news media investigations or law enforcement preventions. "Black
church burnings" appear as such a gambit.

  Hayakawa's other scenario, as "marginalized by John Lear and (ex-Navy)
William Cooper...who was introduced to "UFOlogy" in 1987 by Linda Howe and
others known to be allied with cults in government and Internationalist
persuasions (most recently, the RTC-funded Robert Bigelow...another
"abductions" groupie who now reportedly is funding ex-Army and Dept. of
Energy "non-lethan" and mind-control researcher John Alexander)... was for a
STAGED "alien landing," with REAL "aliens" who allegedly have been in league
with factions of Earth's ruling oligarchies. It is likely that neither of
these will now happen as had been "sown" and promulgated by the
Internationalistas' well-funded and broadly painted "UFOlogical"
disinformations.

  Instead, in pursuit of "global mandates" to reduce human freedoms and
control society with their technologically based "friendly fascism," (See
Richard Gross's book of that name, 1981),  the oligarchs will "show their
talons." And through the manipulated madnesses of folks like Timothy McVeigh
and the "Unabomber," (whoEVER that guy is), questions about whether
American's should cede their civil liberties and rights to the powers of the
oligarchies will be even more marginalized.

  Unless....UNLESS...we educate ourselves and enough of our kids to pick up
some of the threads left for us...like a trail of bread crumbs, or stone
markings in the wilderness of mirrors... by writers like Ray Bradbury
(Fahrenheit 451), Huxley (Brave New World), the Morrises (The Stalk), and
even Newt Gingrich (in his co-authored novel, "1945."), as well as the
warnings of Heinlein and Hubbard. War for Earth is waged in human minds.

  Whichever...or NONE of these "alien landing"...scenarios come to pass or
not, it is incumbent on the news media personnel on this list to keep VERY
open minds about the possibilities that some, or most, of these scenarios may
indeed transpire.

  Although there remain in government...inside CIA and within the Pentagon,
as well as on Capitol Hill... forces bravely fighting against these oligarchs
seeking global control, they remain in the minority because of the combined
suppression of this data, as well as the "bimbo brain-dead" level of our news
managers.

 None of these scenarios are mutually exclusive of any others, given the
power of a fragmented demographics and competing belief systems...as we are
seeing in Germany with the current Scientology debate...and as we have seen
with Aum Shinrikyo, and earlier at Waco and still earlier at Jonestown. These
patent "experimentations" made clear that belief systems can bring on a
"death urge" that can expand exponentially, even nationally.

  When some of us were working WITH one Rockefeller-funded non-profit that
had "making a better world" as its PUBLIC face, we first looked askance at
such "militia paranoias" or claims.

But in our efforts to create effective "public relations" defenses for the
folks who were funding our efforts, looking for any of their other activities
that might have provided the seeds for such "outlandish" allegations...we
later learned that behind the scenes, through their "cut-outs" and treasonous
bastards who had sold out their nation, their uniforms and their oaths to our
country and using ALL of our curiousities and good intentions to confuse the
innocent and well-meaning while covering up the ruthless "applied anomalous
phenomena" that had been stolen from U. S. government-funded research and
farmed out to the "big boys" at Rockefeller University, Stanford, Princeton
and Cornell...as well as to Harvard...we learned that "IT" was all real, even
the most outlandish. Whether it was "true" in the scientific sense was less
clear. But in the minds of the oligarchs and their "pet scientists" and
"social engineers," objective reality did not matter so much as the potential
effectiveness of such "new myths" and "new paradigms" to justify extremist
measures to short-circuit democracy and public discussions, in favor of
"top-down" hierarchic manipulations of global beliefs.

  Your "worst fears" are not fearful enough. Many among the so-called "UFO"
community are now in league with the highest profile "debunkers." Still
others are "cultists" of the highest intelligence, just as has been learned
of Aum Shinrikyo's and the Solar Temple cult of Luc Jouret, (all now
eliminated), but are deluded by their own needs for "closure" and
"certainty," both all-too-human necessities being exploited by the "they."

  The processes of national innoculation...ranging from Waco to Oklahoma
City, and tinged even by the bizarre Polly Klaas and JonBenet Ramsey
slayings...which have had similar "PR effects" and raised questions centering
on the "old FBI's" counterintell operatives...now in private practice and
gracing our televisions almost nightly as they seek to deflect and cover up
their past sins and those of the Bureau's ex-leadership, have proceeded.

  "Mind Control?" We see it every night...and it reaches into the highest
levels of our government. But, hey! It's ain't "over" for our nation yet.
"THEY" (the "aliens" or the "Dark Siders"), who and whatever you might
prefer...are indeed weak. "They" have only the "power" they can persuade us
humans to cede to 'em.

  Keep asking questions. Watch the "Gulf War" syndrome dance as it plays out
with Jay Rockefeller and Arlen Specter making a mockery out of Congressional
process,  while tens of thousands
of our troops suffer...and millions more of our younger people see the
American military as a "no-win" place to volunteer. I'd suggest to you that
demoralization of our youths, to the extent that they will (as did the
"Boomer" generation) self-destruct so as NOT to move our nation and its
ideals farther out across the planet into a workable future is the AMBITION
of the oligarchs.

  Follow the money. Honor your skepticism. Enter your fears.

Actually..."our side" is gaining ground. Soon America will awake from its
hypnotic state and begin preparing to defend its ideas and ideals from the
incursions of China, India and Japan..and from the extreme Islamic nations
where transnational oligarchs
are sowing the seeds of America's confusion and destruction, in their cynical
and delusional effort to maintain control of Earth.

  Remember...if any of this is "real," it has a "politics."

  And if, as Jacques Vallee and some others suggest...indeed, if as
right-wing darling Zechariah Sitchin asserts it is an old war, still going
on... it is our IGNORANCE that plays into the hands of any "conquerer." Our
ignorance, our fear, and our suspicions.

  Seeking and sharing "truth," as we can discern it, is the MOST radical act
we alive and aware of these issues can peform now.
Keep your sense of humor. Even in the bloodiest of wars, it is our ability to
laugh...at ourselves and our oft-times abominable plights...which makes...and
KEEPS...us human in the best sense.

  So all you "UFOlogists" out there: We're laughing WITH you, not "AT"
you....well, most of the time at least. Watch the skies!

Regards,
Dick Farley
<cloudrider@aol.com?
- - - - +

Rockefeller's comment on population....etc.,

ADVANCE FOR RELEASE AT 9:00 A.M. EST, TODAY/

ADVANCE/ WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- At a time when the largest
generation in history is about to reach childbearing age, the United States
has backed away from its 30-year commitment to international family planning
and population programs.  According to a report released today by the
Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. retreat denies millions of couples the
freedom to decide when to have children and how many to have.  The result
will be a dramatic increase in unwanted pregnancies, maternal and child
deaths, and abortions -- as well as stalled progress towards world economic
and social development.

The report, High Stakes:  The United States, Global Population and Our Common
Future, comes at a pivotal moment.  In January 1996, Congress cut funding for
international population assistance by 35 percent.  And, because of complex
spending restrictions, only 13 percent of appropriated funds was actually
released in fiscal year 1996.  Under the FY 1997 appropriations, no funding
will flow to international family planning programs until July 1 unless
Congress approves a resolution in February to release the funds on March 1.

As High Stakes reports, the funding cuts and restrictions have begun to
dismantle an extraordinarily effective program.  Since the 1960s, the United
States has worked in partnership with other nations to provide contraception
and other basic health services to couples in developing countries.  As a
result, more than 50 percent of all couples in those countries now use
contraception, up from just 10 percent in 1960.  The benefits are clear:
fewer women die in childbirth or from abortion, and parents are better able
to feed, educate and provide for their children.  And family planning has
helped slow population growth:  the United Nations reports that by the year
2050 there will be about one-half billion fewer people in the world than
previously expected.

U.S. leadership in family planning "demonstrates the best of American
traditions -- the traditions of individual freedom, giving people in need the
tools to help themselves, and helping to strengthen families," said Peter
Goldmark, Rockefeller Foundation president.

But the work of U.S. family planning programs is far from finished. Demand
for contraception is growing much faster than supply.  High Stakes reports
that by the year 2000, some 800 million people -- one seventh of the world's
population -- will be teenagers.  The childbearing choices those young people
make will have profound effects on their own lives and on the quality of life
in our shared world.

The report makes clear that international family planning programs reduce
rather than increase abortions, as some have charged.  Based on U.N. data,
the report shows that "in Hungary, for example, abortion rates were
increasing in the late 1960s -- reaching a peak of about 80 per 1,000 women
-- while contraceptive use hovered at around 20 percent.  Then a dramatic
increase in contraceptive use, to more than 50 percent of couples in 1978,
was accompanied by a sharp drop in abortion rates to just over 30 per 1,000
women in 1986."

Where couples cannot plan their families, high fertility is part of a vicious
circle of poverty and rapid population growth.  High Stakes reveals that
population growth magnifies the challenges facing developing countries, by
exacerbating poverty, unemployment and natural resource scarcities.

"In the race to provide a decent quality of life for the world's people,
population growth keeps raising the hurdles that nations must leap," the
report observes.

The United States also has a growing and direct economic interest in the
stability of many of the developing countries served by population planning
programs.  As noted in the report, " ... developing countries are among the
fastest growing markets for U.S. products.  This means that more U.S. jobs
depend on purchasing power and political stability overseas ... But U.S.
companies cannot do business in nations that are convulsed by political
unrest, or that are too poor to buy our products ... "

These issues are of critical importance to Americans, according to David
Rockefeller, international philanthropist, former chairman of Chase Manhattan
Bank and grandson of the Foundation's founder.  "National and global security
are no longer defined by military strength alone," said Rockefeller.  "They
are and will be defined by human well-being, social and economic progress and
sustainable development.  Low wages, lack of jobs, poverty, resource
depletion and civil unrest affect the whole world.  I'm convinced that U.S.
support of international family planning has been an investment with enormous
return in the realization of human potential."

"High Stakes shows that family planning programs are a cost-effective
investment in human well-being," said Alice Stone Ilchman, chairman of the
board of trustees of the Foundation and president of Sarah Lawrence College.
U.S. spending on international family planning peaked in 1995 at $583
million, or less than three one-hundredths of one percent of the federal
budget. Developing countries pay three-quarters of the costs of their family
planning programs, and other industrialized nations contribute as well.

"Many Americans are skeptical about the money spent on foreign assistance,"
said Goldmark.  "The report shows how 30 years of U.S. leadership and
investment in international family planning have paid enormous dividends
worldwide."

The withdrawal of U.S. leadership may also derail a consensus reached by 184
nations to slow population growth and spur development.  At an international
population conference held in Cairo, Egypt in 1994, the world's nations
agreed on a groundbreaking plan that would make needed investments in human
well-being, including family planning and other reproductive health services.
 "Every element of that plan would improve the quality of life for
individuals and families," said Goldmark.  "And every element would ease the
pressures of rapid population growth."

The U.S. retreat from that agreement creates a leadership vacuum that could
be filled by those who advocate extreme positions which would either restrict
access to contraception or force women to use it.

"Since the 1960s, we have been able to maintain a fair, bipartisan and
centrist approach to international family planning," said Goldmark.  "With
this center in danger of crumbling, we at the Rockefeller Foundation believe
that the American public needs to understand just what we stand to lose.  And
when they do, they will reaffirm that family planning is integral to the
prosperity and stability of our shared world."

Goldmark stressed that, "The issue of whether it is wise for the United
States to abandon its 30-year commitment to international population
assistance should be subject to the most searching and serious public debate.
That debate has not taken place.  We hope this report will contribute to it."


To order a copy of High Stakes:  The United States, Global Population and Our
Common Future (With Foreword by David Rockefeller) Media Only: Please call

Dare Hurley, 202-835-8874;  General Public: Fax requests to 201-529-1119.
Reference the Rockefeller Foundation Project No. 603.

SOURCE  The Rockefeller Foundation

CO:  The Rockefeller Foundation

ST:  District of Columbia

IN:  HEA

SU:  LEG

01/29/97 07:11 EST http://www.prnewswire.com