Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> Ufomind Mailing List -> 1999 -> May -> Joshua Gulick Antigravity Paper

NOTICE: The page below has been permenently FROZEN as of January 2000. Due to resource limitations, this section of our website is no longer maintained, so some links may not work and some information may be out of date. We have retained this page for archive reference only, and we cannot vouch for its accuracy. Broken links will not be repaired, and minor errors will not be corrected. You are responsible for independently verifying any information you may find here. More Info

Joshua Gulick Antigravity Paper

From: campbell@ufomind.com (Glenn Campbell, Las Vegas)
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 10:07:44 -0700

This paper kept me amused for about 15 minutes, up until the part
where an antigravity device "punched through the ceiling and roof
of the lab at a speed that was later estimated to be around Mach 8."

Gulick says of himself on his website: "A month and a half ago, I
resigned my job as a database janitor at Bank One in Ohio.  I did so in
order to conduct some independent research on various topics.  I had
faith that God would lead me to significant discoveries - you may judge
whether that faith was misplaced :)"

Gulick says the key to antigravity is not boron or element 115
but bismuth.  Here is his paper (via jstark@mail.udg.mx)...

----- Begin Forwarded Message -----

Introduction: this paper is in a non-traditional format.  This
was done for a reason. I was torn between releasing a highly
scientific paper that most would not understand and releasing
a non-technical document that would be disregarded by
the scientific community. With this format, I may have the
best (or worst) of both.  I'm not sure which.  I am, however,
working on a journal-ready treatise.

Here is a missing chapter from a future physics book.

                Chapter 7: Antigravity

                   by Joshua Gulick

Section 1: What is antigravity?

Section 2: How was antigravity harnessed?

             Section 1: What is antigravity?

As was noted in Chapter 2, Einstein's "cosmological constant,"
a postulated minute repulsion force necessary to account
for the absence of universal gravitational compression was
not completely rejected until 1999 when it was discovered
that it was not a constant at all, but must have varied
over the universe's life.   Equations didn't allow for the
acceleration of the newborn universe accurately without
increasing the cosmological constant.

Also that year, it was determined that the beautiful,
unexplained, axial jets of matter and x-rays and gamma rays
observed from black holes, neutron stars and galactic
centers were the result of a repulsive force arising perpendicular
to their rotation. [see http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/newhome/
headlines/ast11jun97_1.htm for info on these jets.  Note that
the jets appear to turn on and off as one would expect if
matter passed over the axial repulsive fields variably] The
repulsive effect is so strong from galactic centers that if our
 sun were placed in the repulsive field, its entire mass would
be accelerated almost instantly to a speed quite near to the
speed of light. Not only that, but the light emitted by the sun
would be compressed to x-ray and gamma-ray energies as it
traveled down the repulsion gradient. This wavelength
compression happens in an opposite fashion to the wavelength
expansion that is theorized to occur as light nears a
massive gravitational source.  Soon after these discoveries
were described, the"cosmological constant" was discarded
and equations describing the antigravitic effect substituted.

The antigravitic effect is best visualized as a two-body
interaction. Assume the two bodies have equal mass and
therefore equal gravitational pull. Assume the bodies are
in a stable orbit around one another, maintaining an equal
distance between them. The bodies orbit in a single plane
around a single axis. As they orbit, a repulsive force is emitted
from each body perpendicular to the orbital plane. The force
is equal to each body's resistance to the gravitational pull
of the other. In other words, the resistance to orbital
compression is redirected perpendicular to the orbital plane. In our
example, the average repulsive effect could be visualized as
a cylinder or repulsion perpendicular to the orbital plane
and intersecting with the orbital path. The repulsive force
increases exponentially as the orbital plane is approached. As
the mass and orbital speeds increase, the antigravity forces
are likewise increased.

In most situations, the antigravity force is insignificant, due,
in part, to the perpendicularity of the effect and also because
the gravitational forces resisted are normally minute.  This
is why the "cosmological constant" was set so low and often
questioned.  However, a black hole's gravitational pull is
hardly small. It's this incredibly strong gravity that causes the
huge antigravitic displays from black holes as their cores
rotate and resist further compression.

Descriptive equations of antigravitic interactions are only
simple in two dimensions. It's impossible to predict the repulsive
effect generated by the complex and variable rotation of our
sun. Suffice it to say that repulsion is strongest from the axis
and negligible from the plane of rotation. It is this repulsive
effect that accounts for the planarity, or disk-like shape of our
own solar system and the repulsion of enough matter to form our
Oort cloud. It is also this effect that accounts for the
planarity of a black hole's accretion disk and even the planarity
of galaxies.

        Section 2: How was antigravity harnessed?

No discussion of antigravity would be complete without
discussing the discoveries that allowed humanity to harness the
repulsive force. In 1999 again, it was discovered that the
antigravity effect could be duplicated in a laboratory by
spinning atomic nuclei at very high speeds. An atom's nucleus
is ultra-dense, not so unlike a tiny black hole. Because
nuclei rotate fairly stabily and without friction, it is
possible to accelerate their rotation to their maximum speed and
produce very strong antigravitic effects.

So, how does one make nuclei rotate? It was discovered that
certain nucleic geometries reflect, to a small degree, the
movements of nearby electrons. The elements that exhibit
such geometries have an odd number of protons and an even
number of neutrons. In such atoms, the protons are not
uniformly dispersed throughout the nucleus. Instead, one side of
the nucleus is slightly more positive than the other.
Elements that have this unbalanced nuclear charge are called
electro-rotational elements. They exhibit a slight natural
antigravitic effect which may be deduced by observing their
atomic radii. The atomic radii of electro-rotational elements
are significantly smaller than expected due to the repulsive
effect generated by neighboring atoms. The electro-rotational
element with the most massive nucleus is Bismuth,
element 83. Its nucleus has the greatest gravitational pull
and therefore can demonstrate the largest antigravitic effect
when spun.

It was discovered that a sufficient electrical charge passed
down a micro-thin ribbon of Bismuth sped and aligned the
rotation of the Bismuth nuclei so that the axis were aligned
perpendicular to the electrical flow. It was also discovered that
micro-layers of Bismuth exhibit near superconductive properties
at room temperature. This near superconductivity
happens as the nuclei spin at very high speeds and act as
miniature flywheels, guiding the electron flow and reducing
electrical resistance. [Note from Joshua 4/24/99: my latest
findings seems to suggest that micro-filaments and
micro-layers of Bismuth exhibit true supeconductivity at room
temperature.  See the info on the first page of my website.]

The first atomic antigravitic device was constructed in 1999.
My, that was a busy year! The device was simply a 10
centimeter wide ribbon of Bismuth half a kilometer long and an
average of 3 microns thick. It was coiled around a hollow
copper core with a similar, 25-micron thick dielectric ribbon
coiled around the core and between each Bismuth layer. The
free end of the bismuth ribbon was grounded. When a high-voltage
charge was applied to the copper core, the device
punched through the ceiling and roof of the lab at a speed that
was later estimated to be around Mach 8.

The antigravity platforms that we see every day use three
standard antigravity generators of this type mounted at angles
around an axis with 120 degrees separating each. Other designs
were explored. One of the most successful ideas was
to apply the Bismuth and dielectric layers directly to the
exterior surface of a craft. This antigravitic "skin" slightly lowered
manufacturing costs and allowed easier repairs. It also
allowed us to explore our solar system with a greater safety factor
and at higher speeds due to the protection from micro-meteorites
offered by the repulsion field that surrounded the craft.
[To see some fragments of actual antigravitic "skin" and
learn about them, visit http://www.artbell.com/rosreprt.html]

The first shape to get its antigravitic skin was the cigar
shape. It was coated with the successive Bismuth and dielectric
layers. When a sufficient high-voltage charge was passed
across the Bismuth micro-layers from one end to the other,
the repulsive field was generated tangential to the "skin"
and perpendicular to the axis plane, giving a nice, stable lift.
With the addition of two standard antigrav generators (one
at each end of the cigar) maneuverability was achieved.

The traditional "flying saucer" shape was explored next.
It was coated similarly and charged from top to bottom. Again,
the repulsive field was generated tangential to the "skin"
and perpendicular to the axis plane. Sitting on the ground, it
repulsed laterally, providing zero lift. To direct the repulsion
force from the lateral, the electrical flow needed to be made
to travel around the axis instead of taking the shortest,
fastest route between poles. The closer the spiraling of the
electron flow, the closer the repulsive field aligns with
the axis plane and therefore repulses more up and down. This
spiraling was accomplished first with a spirally wound core
and then more efficiently with a winding just deep of exterior
surface.  With this design, only one standard antigrav
generator mounted axially is needed to provide maneuverability.
 [Note from Joshua 4/24/99: the addition of a ferrous layer
near the winding, may or may not increase efficiency.  I don't
know.  Using pulsed, high voltage DC, it's possible that in
such an arrangement, nucleic rotation would be affected by
both the electrical flow and the magnetic field.]

There are limitations to these craft arising from the fact
that all the repulsive forces are directed tangential to the surface
and never reach the interior of the craft. This limited the
acceleration and deceleration to that which a human body could
withstand. Then somebody had a brilliant idea. Why not put the
occupants outside, on top of the craft. This way, the
repulsion forces generated would, to a large degree, counter-
balance the inertial forces on occupants as the craft
accelerated. This is why we see domes on the top of early
designs. Eventually, it was discovered that by using an
exterior surface that had a sine wave ripple instead of a
smooth surface, the repulsive effect could be directed into the
interior.

                   In conclusion:

Antigravity has allowed us to safely explore our solar system
and to send explorers at high speeds to nearby stars. It
gave us unlimited, clean, electrical power. It brought humanity
together as nothing had before and caused us all to think
seriously about our collective future. It eliminated much of
our pollution and allowed our planet to begin to heal. It also
made everyone look carefully at the magnificent design of the
Universe and consider that it may have been intelligently
created.

           A personal statement from the author

Of course, this information is not really from the future
any more than I am. This information is, however, factual, though
perhaps not chronologically correct.

And now, I would like to personally and sincerely apologize
to the individuals, governments and corporate entities that
may have to change their plans, and/or accept financial and
other losses due to the release of this knowledge. However,
I believe that it is quite proper now to release this
information and allow our society its rightful technological leap. For if
antigravity itself does not allow super-efficient electrical
generation due to the Laws of Conservation, it certainly does
provide the means to supply our entire electrical requirements.
For, with simple antigravity platforms high in the
atmosphere and very long wires reaching down to the ground,
as Tesla proposed, we may siphon off as much electricity
as we like from our atmosphere, which is continually being
recharged anyway.

In order to offset the negative a bit, I presently offer my
ideas, designs, and theories, indeed my antigravitational
technology, and my ability to profit from it - to every
individual, government, and corporate entity. But only if we agree to
one condition. We have to share it. And we have to help those
whose lives are disrupted due to it. Oh, that's two
conditions. Well, we should do both, but we must share.

Oh, it will be weird to see strange things floating around.
I wonder if they'll make the horses bolt?

For more information on this and my other research, or to
comment on this paper, please contact me at:
Joshua Gulick

69 and One Half N. Franklin Street

Delaware, OH 43015

or you may use my e-mail address: joshua.gulick@cheerful.com

But, I would rather you use the bulletin board on my site:

http://www.freez.com/joshua

I have never been employed as theoretician, but any
employment offers (joint research, perhaps - I'll work cheap!) or
other proposals may be sent to the same address(es).
If you would like to be involved in the next stage of my research,
let me know.

Thanks and God bless,

Joshua

P.S. If you think it is worthwhile, please forward this to
others who might appreciate it. Include your comments, too, if you
would.  You may copy, redistribute, publish, or do whatever
else you want with this paper;  I reserve no rights, but please
acknowledge my contributions.

----- End Forwarded Message -----

+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|                    UFOMIND MAILING LIST                      |
|       Supporting the World's Largest Paranormal Website      |
|       www.ufomind.com         Moderator: Glenn Campbell      |
|                                                              |
| Archived at: http://www.ufomind.com/misc/                    |
| Submissions to: ufomind@lists.best.com                       |
| "unsubscribe" (in body) to: ufomind-request@lists.best.com   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+

RELEVANCE OF THIS MESSAGE: Archetypal

Index: Joshua Gulick (#2)


Mothership -> Ufomind Mailing List -> 1999 -> May -> Here

Our Design and Original Text Copyrighted © 1994-99 Area 51 Research Center
PO Box 30303, Las Vegas, NV 89173   Glenn Campbell, Webmaster & Moderator

This site is supported by the Ufomind Bookstore
Please visit our business if you appreciate our free web services.  New Items

Send corrections to webmaster@ufomind.com

This page: http://www.aliensonearth.com/misc/1999/may/d06-001.shtml   (11/21/00 4:00)
We encourage you to link to this page from your own. No permission required.

Created: May 6, 1999