Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Here

From: "Scott K. Hale" <shale@megalinx.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 17:44:40 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 03:20:59 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

UFO UpDates - Toronto wrote:

> From: KRandle993@aol.com
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 09:34:54 -0500
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

> In a message dated 96-12-09 12:25:08 EST, Stan Friedman wrote:

> << For Ed Stewart, Kevin Ran, Glenn Campbell:

>  <Until we have access to the classified files,
>  <we cannot know the history of Area 51. Why is
>  <that so hard to understand? We are not talking
>  <about storage of apples and oranges, but of
>  <crashed saucer wreckage and alien bodies. The
>  <government has not admitted having either.
>  <Unclassified literature doesn't tell us about
>  <Compartmented information.

> But we do have access to the public records which show no evidence of any
> secret facility in that area in 1954. There are photographs of people at the
> site as shown in magazines and no evidence offered that people couldn't, and
> didn't roam the area in 1954. The evidence shows that the classification and
> restrictions to access to the area began AFTER 1954.

> The record seems clear on this point. There was no secret, top secret,
> facility located there in 1954. The record shows construction began after
> 1954. Can you offer any sort of credible evidence that such is not the case?
> Isn't it up to you to now prove that we are wrong rather than suggest a
> secret facility there?
>
> < Proclamations are not the same as evidence.

> Then stop doing it.

> KRandle


Kevin,

Couldn't the facility be located somewhere in the Papoose range? To my
knowlege (I have 800+ pages of Area 51 info) not many people were in that
area then, or now. Is it possible that the supposed facility was
underground? Yet again, was the manual updated since it's initial
conception? Just some thoughts.

Regards,
Scott K. Hale