Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Re: Abduction Question

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Vince_Johnson_at_TENSOR__HSTN@ccmailsmtp.hstn.expl.pgs.com
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 96 13:54:14 cst
Fwd Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 12:11:58 -0500
Subject: Re: Abduction Question


     John Velez wrote:

>Jorgen, the connection that you're trying to make here, (military
>involvement in abductions) is to me, on the face of it a complete
>impossibility. They could NEVER get away with it.

>Aside from the fact that 'someone' would have 'talked' long before now,
>the logistics of such a broad scale operation would require large
>numbers of personel and materials to accomplish.

>Example: personel. Let's say that you manage to recruit a few psychotics
>that are willing to help you kidnap citizens (and) keep their loyal mouths
>shut about it. Then I assume that you propose that these humans are either
>carrying out the abductions in conjunction with the aliens, or... by
>themselves, using 'alien technology' ie; flying saucers.

>Then we multiply this number in order to reach the minimum required to
>conduct hundreds or thousands of these abductions. Do you see where I'm
>going with this Jorgen? It's just physically impossible. They would have
>to employ so many people that someone somewhere would have blown the
>whistle on it ages ago. Even if only to make a few bucks on the lecture
>circuit! <G>

>I would believe that [some folks], [here and there] have been snatched in
>the night by operatives of some intelligence group or other for monitoring
>purposes, or to see if they can add information to their alien technology
>database. (I believe something like that happened to my friend Debbie
>Jordan, from "Intruders") But I don't for a minute think that its possible
>to pull something like that off of a large scale. It would involve too
>many people, that, in itself would be its major weakness and prove to be
>the source of its downfall. It would just become too "messy" and
>cumbersome an operation.

     Hi John,

     The same logistical problem you describe (excluding the need for
     "human" secrecy) would be just as applicable to the "alien abduction"
     scenario, wouldn't it?

     While any hypothetical alien supertechnology may be impressively
     dependable, I can't conceive of even advanced alien technology totally
     overcoming the ironclad principles of Murphy's Law.

     Regards,

     Vince