From: jvif@spacelab.net (John Velez)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 00:46:36 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 13:28:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Abduction Question
>From: Vince_Johnson_at_TENSOR__HSTN@ccmailsmtp.hstn.expl.pgs.com
>Date: Thu, 12 Dec 96 13:54:14 cst
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Abduction Question
> John Velez wrote:
>>Jorgen, the connection that you're trying to make here, (military
>>involvement in abductions) is to me, on the face of it a complete
>>impossibility. They could NEVER get away with it.
>>Aside from the fact that 'someone' would have 'talked' long before now,
>>the logistics of such a broad scale operation would require large
>>numbers of personel and materials to accomplish.
>>Example: personel. Let's say that you manage to recruit a few psychotics
>>that are willing to help you kidnap citizens (and) keep their loyal mouths
>>shut about it. Then I assume that you propose that these humans are either
>>carrying out the abductions in conjunction with the aliens, or... by
>>themselves, using 'alien technology' ie; flying saucers.
>>Then we multiply this number in order to reach the minimum required to
>>conduct hundreds or thousands of these abductions. Do you see where I'm
>>going with this Jorgen? It's just physically impossible. They would have
>>to employ so many people that someone somewhere would have blown the
>>whistle on it ages ago. Even if only to make a few bucks on the lecture
>>circuit! <G>
>>I would believe that [some folks], [here and there] have been snatched in
>>the night by operatives of some intelligence group or other for monitoring
>>purposes, or to see if they can add information to their alien technology
>>database. (I believe something like that happened to my friend Debbie
>>Jordan, from "Intruders") But I don't for a minute think that its possible
>>to pull something like that off of a large scale. It would involve too
>>many people, that, in itself would be its major weakness and prove to be
>>the source of its downfall. It would just become too "messy" and
>>cumbersome an operation.
> Hi John,
> The same logistical problem you describe (excluding the need for
> "human" secrecy) would be just as applicable to the "alien abduction"
> scenario, wouldn't it?
You're throwing out the baby with the bathwater Vince. My whole point was
thet I didn't think that any "human" agency could pull it off. I know the
aliens can.
> While any hypothetical alien supertechnology may be impressively
> dependable, I can't conceive of even advanced alien technology totally
> overcoming the ironclad principles of Murphy's Law.
Fact is they haven't. They haven't been completely sucessful in their
'clandestine' efforts or we wouldn't be discussing them! (chime in sci-fi
sound track, oooweeeeahhhoooo)<G>
Take care vince,
John Velez
jvif@spacelab.net
"INTRUDERS FOUNDATION ONLINE"
http://www.spacelab.net/~jvif/bhhp.html
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com