UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: KRandle993@aol.com Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 16:13:44 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 13:21:14 -0500 Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51 In a message dated 96-12-14 13:48:54 EST, Scott Hale writes: << Ed, < Re: MJ-12 < To answer your quesion, IF a group like MJ-12 existed, there would <be no supporting documentation anywhere you or anyone outside of the <loop could get at it. <Re: Bob Lazar <Doesn't it seem like Lazar's records could be destroyed by the <government, IF his story was true? But does this make sense? Could they destroy all records? What about those that Lazar himself should have? Could we not find other students, teachers, who remember him at the school? Could we find no record for his tuition payments to the school? If the University of Iowa attempted, on government orders, to wipe out the record of my attendance there, I could find lots of other ways of proving it, including the grade transcripts I've kept filed for more years than I care to admit. <Re: Your comments about belief systems < I don't hold any one particular "belief system". You too must <realize, that being a total skeptic is a belief system as well. I don't <know what your religon is, but total denial is a belief in itself. Now, <I don't mean to call you a total skeptic, because I don't know what your <beliefs are. I have done much work into MJ-12, including the Truman <signature. The signature isn't identical, it's close though. One must <wonder where Phil Klass "found" this signature. How in the thousands of <Truman signatures did he find an "exact" match? Did he sit there for <days with a ruler and go through them? I know they aren't identical <because I scanned them both, and made some acetate(spellling?) overlays. <Right now I am led to belive that the SOM is fake. If it is, so what? <Couldn't it be a copycat hoax? I think it's possible that the Ike papers <are genuine. When I began UFO research, I thought MJ-12 was surely a <hoax, now I'm not too sure. <Regards, <Scott K. Hale < P.S. I love these discussions, they're so enjoyable! >> I've spoken to a questioned document expert (as has Stan) who told me that the Truman memo was not shot straight on so that you have, on the photographic print, some distortion of the dimensions of the signature. I have also been told that the copying process distorts the signature further, so that it would depend on what generation you used for your measurements. Because of these distortions, you can't make an acetate overlay for comparison. On the other hand, the Truman signature is situated uncharacteristicly low on the memo. This man said that to him, the signature was lifted from an October 1, 1947 document and transplanted. Although there are claims of other questioned document experts who say otherwise, I have been unable to locate them. KRandle
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com