Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: BGBOPPER@aol.com
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 01:32:55 -0500
Fwd Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:26:26 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

Mr. Friedman, In my second post I asked,*
*	1. If we agree on the fact that area 51 is a top secret test facility (and
I'm sure that we all know that it is just that) and if the only reference to
any alien object at area 51 was made by Bob Lazar... What is the point?

You answered,

>1.I have many times said, there are 2 separate questions: Is Bob Lazar
telling the truth about >Bob Lazar? 2. Are there saucers at Area 51? That Bob
is lying about Bob clearly tells us nothing >about whther there are saucers
there. I have had a quiet witness tell me there were saucers >brought there
back in the 1940s. Led Stringfield has told of people saying there were
saucers >there. It is an obvious site for testing of any kind of highly
classified advanced propulsion >system.

I then asked,
Mr. Friedman, Your answer brings up another question.
Are you saying that there have been saucers at Area 51 since the 1940's?

And then you reply with,
> I didn't say I believed there have been saucers at Area 51 back to the
>1940s. I said I had heard stories completely independent of Lazar about
saucers
>there.
I find it very interesting that you use your "Quiet Witness" and Led (Len)
Stringfield...(Ya see Stan... I do my homework... I Knew that you meant Len
<Grin>) to make an argument, and then you reverse your stance the very next
day.  Hmmmm verrrrry interesting!

You also said that my questions "Had imbedded in them a lot of false
assumptions."
The only false assumption that I made was thinking that you might answer them
in a civil and straight forward manner.

Stan, I think I'll leave my marbles right here.
Even though I am honored that you find it necessary to throw in a few cutting
remarks  you might reconsider getting into a duel with me, it is
unproductive.

Thanks once again for your response,
R. Estes