You forgot "www." at the beginning of the server name! You have accessed this page though an incomplete server name: ufomind.com instead of www.ufomind.com --- so some services may not work. Please go to the correct address for this page to make this message go away.

Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Here

From: Greg Sandow <GSANDOW@prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 21:53:23 -0500
Fwd Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:48:42 -0500
Subject: Re: 'Fake' and 'Self-Proclaimed'

Jorgen wrote:

> Hi Greg.

> There's one thing that struck me as I read your post:

> Do you mean to use a "imitating-image" (I didn't say fake) of an alien
> and show it to abductees to see if they have seen the figure before?
> Alright if it was a single alien-person, but to me it sounds like
> showing a picture of a black man to a race of whites and they will go
> "Yeah! He's black alright!".

> I don't mean to offend you, but you're not talking about a person -
> you're talking about a whole supposed alien race here, right?

> Jorgen / WUFOC

Hi, Jurgen.

I wasn't thinking of showing abductees a single alien image. I imagine
they've all seen images like it before, in the media, if not (as they
believe) in reality.

My thought was to show them several variants of that image. And the
images do vary a lot. The one on Communion has a longer face than the
one on Intruders, and the one Strieber posted recently looks more
fetus-like than either.

If the abductees mostly picked one image as closest to what they've
claimed to really see, I thought that might suggest their claims were
true.

Is that clearer?

Greg Sandow