Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Scott K. Hale" <shale@megalinx.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 14:12:06 -0500
Fwd Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 17:41:21 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

> Of all the thousands and thousands of Truman documents, the signature
> known to be genuine comes from a short letter from President Truman to
> Dr. Bush, dated October 1, 1947 - one week after the alleged Truman
> Memorandum of September 24, 1947. Interesting that they were dated only
> a week apart and that the known real signature was also addressed to an
> alleged MJ-12 member. Dr. Vannevar Bush has been a focus of intense
> research by many ufologists since the late 70s and the emergence of the
> Wilbur Smith memo.
>
> Assuming that the two signatures have to be identical is a false
> assumption. As a matter of fact, they are not identical. Supporters of
> MJ-12 base their arguments on an incorrect argument. What can be
> demonstrated and shown is whether or not the two signature samples share
> a common ancestor. Dr. Willy Smith, UNICAT Project, published his
> analysis demonstrating that both the known real signature and the
> alleged Truman memorandum signature do indeed share a common ancestor.
> Since we know that the Oct. 1, 1947 signature is a genuine signature,
> the Truman signature of the alleged Truman/Forrestal memo has to be a
> copy of the original. That makes the entire memo bogus. The step-by-step
> analysis was published in JUST CAUSE, No. 27, March 1991. I suggest you
> find a copy and read it. You won't find it in Friedman's new book. On
> several occasions on this list I have asked Friedman about it. To this
> date he has yet to respond to the above damming evidence that shows the
> alleged Truman/Forrestal memorandum to be bogus. I have also recently
> spoken to Dr. Willy Smith. He tells me that since the publication of his
> analysis in JUST CAUSE in 1991, the analysis has never been addressed by
> Friedman.

> Ed Stewart
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ed Stewart - egs@netcom.com

Ed,

    I am very interested in the copy of Just Cause you mentioned. Could
you please be so kind as to mail me a copy? If it is possible for you to
do this, please respond to the group and I will e-mail you my snail mail
address. Do we know that Mr. Klass started with the date that the memo
was supposedly written in the archives? If he didn't, it doesn't solve
how he found the signature. Isn't it important to find out who faked the
document(IF it was faked)? If the document is fraudulent, it doesn't
make the document less important. Obviously, whoever may have faked the
document would have to take a great deal of time doing it. Just some
thoughts.

Regards,
Scott K. Hale