Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: KRandle993@aol.com
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 09:46:06 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:14:53 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

Stanton Friedman wrote:

>Re Kevins comments: I am sorry I didn't put (grin) after my comment
>which was not an allegation about you and Ed and disinformation.

I should have pointed out that Friedman's retraction of his statement after
making it really isn't sufficient since there are those on this list who seem
to have taken it at face value. I notice that ex-priest, Richard Boylan was
all to ready to accept the allegation as fact with nothing to support it.

<.Re the 29 papers referred to by me as
<relating to Roswell and MJ-12 and not referenced by you. NONE were self
<published. I noted 3 other papers that are self published. The rest were
<published by somebody else like IUR etc.   Stan Friedman

I seem to have missed something here. Once there were 70 papers that he had
produced. Now there are 29. But there are three that were self-published.
Others appeared in newsletters for UFO organizations and had a circulation of
about 5000 at best. That, of course, is not considered to be "professional"
publication. One of the exceptions that you mentioned, FATE, is certainly not
the epitome of journalistic excellence with their stories on ghosts,
predictions for the coming year, and "snakes and salvation." So how many of
your papers have been published in magazines or books that have a circulation
above 5000? And how many were published in magazines that actually PAID for
them?

Sure, I'm being a little snobbish here. But I'm not hiding behind a title
that is what, twenty-five years old? I'm not telling people that I had
learned that people would believe anything I said because of my "golden
credentials. I'm not the one dodging questions when they get too tough, or
changing the rules because I don't like the way the game is being played.
Come on, Stan, answer the questions about MJ-12, Area 51, and the rest, or
admit that you don't have the answers yet and it's beginning to look as if
you swallowed the ball.

KRandle