Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Here

From: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 96 04:44:58 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:04:00 -0500
Subject: Re: MJ-12 and Area 51

Kevin: Now you are being ridiculous. I said that you had not referenced 29
of 30
papers I had published about Roswell/MJ-12 in your long list in " The Truth
about UCR". That is a true statement.You said they were self published.That
is a
false statement. I noted that there were 3 other papers that were indeed self
published.Meaning I wrote them and had them printed, and distributed them and
nobody  else was involved.The profit has been as good as though I had been paid
to write them. Now you are defining self published  as in a journal with a
circulation over 5000.Are you suggesting that all the other referenced papers
met that criteria?? Ex post facto statement.
Did I say professional?No. You did.And  I didn't say published in any
particular
size journal. After all none of the MJ 12 papers referenced by ED Stewart fill
that bill, do they? I suspect that my long unreferenced by Ed paper in a book
edited by Tim Good does though.. and so does TOP SECRET/MAJIC. I clearly said
papers related to Roswell/MJ-12. The "more than 70 papers" cover many other
aspects of UFOs.Yes, of course Fate isn't the ultimate nor Saga. Nor UFO
Universe,(you have published there, too) but it has a larger circulation than
5000 as do both UFO Magazines.. That doesn't include nuclear papers in Atlantic
Advocate ,Ascent, Nickel, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society,
Science,
etc.  I am not trying to compete with you as a writer. Not many can.  As you
know I have often mentioned in awe  your more than 77 books of fiction. An
impressive mumber indeed. Why not just say you made a mistake or should have
put
<grin> after the phrase. If you really want a list. I will send one.

Stan Friedman