Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Here

From: James Easton <100626.2242@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 19:37:40 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 05:02:58 -0500
Subject: Re: Genesis and Provenance

Regarding...

>Date: 18 Dec 96 19:34:13 EST
>From: Theresa <70571.1735@CompuServe.COM>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Genesis and Provenance

Theresa Carlson wrote:

<<It was Bob Shell who had arranged with Kodak that they would test the
film for free. >>

>    Whoa!  Is there some differences again!  I don't know exactly where
your own opinions are, but.....

    I thought the general concensus around here was that Bob Shell was not
credible or reliable???<


Theresa,

It wouldn't, in all seriousness, concern me what others opinions were of
Bob Shell, around here or out there.

It's what Bob may contribute as evidence which has to deemed credible or
otherwise.


>    Until some sort of agreement is reached, how do we know if we are
suppose to
believe or disbelieve that Bob Shell can have the film tested for free, or
tested at all for that matter, or that he made any arrangements at all?
Did
someone check?<

Yes, I've seen transcripts of interviews with Tony Amato at Kodak.

As Tony confirmed last year:

"We were promised film back in July. we have been promised film right along
on this. I was told before that we had film coming and got everyone ready
to do the test as quickly and expeditiously as possible. And the film never
showed up".


As you know, I have asked Bob for a summary of the current position re the
theoretical testing of any meaningful archive film, and I was very
surprised to see him claim that Tony Amato/Kodak had been more than just
uncooperative about testing any film samples or providing assistance.

I've asked him to clarify exactly what he's implying and if he's seriously
suggesting, as it appears he is, that it's all part of some conspiracy.



James.
Internet; 100626.2242@compuserve.com