Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1996 -> Dec -> Re: Genesis and Provenance

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Theresa <70571.1735@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 22 Dec 96 17:51:39 EST
Fwd Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 08:06:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Genesis and Provenance

To Rebecca Schatte:


Rebecca,


<<According to Tony Amato, while the short-term loan of a complete reel of film
would be desirable, Kodak would be willing to work with as little as two or
three frames. ...">>

      Thank you.

     Now Kent is out of it, and it's down to Tony Amato's statements and Bob
Shell's statements which are in conflict.  Let's see what Bob comes up with, I
have already asked him.   The only  reason it was important was that Kent made
this statement on a recent broadcast.


<<A better question to ask would be who has the most to gain by misleading
anyone?>>

    Or who has the most to lose?


    Regards,

      Theresa