From: "Julianne Presson" <earthwrk@cyberport.com> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 10:30:06 -0700 Fwd Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 13:01:58 -0500 Subject: Re: Carl Sagan > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 21:56:38 -0500 > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> > From: Michael Christol <mchristo@atl.mindspring.com> > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Carl Sagan > > >Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 16:51:11 -0500 > >From: Jerry Washington <skyeking@aye.net> > >Organization: Kentucky/MUFON > >To: updates@globalserve.net > >Subject: Sagan & Dr. Boylan > Hi Jerry. > > I agree with you. While I will not attack "Carl Sagan, The Man," I will > gratefully > acknowledge my lack of regret that "Carl Sagan, the Astronomer and Debunker" > is gone. > Some will reply that you cannot separate the TWO. I argue differently. For his > and our sake, as a species, it is hoped that we will survive because, someone > was able to separate the "chaff" from the "wheat." Merry Christmas Mike, I just can not leave this alone. I do not agree with you, this is beginning to remind me of the book burners. Instead of books you people are burning Carl Sagan. For anyone to dismiss all of Sagan's works because he would not take the side of the true believers is like saying there IS only one side and you people are on that one -right- side. Those of us who choose to wait for some form of evidence are all -debunkers- to you. You are saying those of us who do not agree with you should not say anything. > The "chaff" being our outer appearances, i.e., Carl Sagan the Astronomer. > The "Wheat" on the other hand being "Carl Sagan" the Man. > That part of him grew and advanced as all others, but that was the man > behind the mask. (shaking head) I AM surprised you see NO value in anything the Astronomer did. He disagreed because there is NO scientific evidence and he is condemned for that. > Unfortunately, it is "The Mask" that most of us knew. We judge him by that > which is seen and heard. Why judge his opinion at all. That was all it was, it did NOT shadow all the great works he did as a scientist or man. > To the "Mask" I say "good riddance." I'm sorry, but I cannot be a hypocrite > about it. I will not show two different faces to my peers. That is the > problem today. We want to say what will not offend, even though we know > it is not so. You are condemning Carl Sagan for NOT being a hypocrite. He stood by his beliefs and you say -good riddance-..... What is really going on here is that those who -want- to believe there are good aliens coming because they have been here before feel threatened by a man like Sagan who voices his opinion. Do you think he should have -not offended- and kept his opinion to himself? You people who are -happy- that Carl Sagan is gone (BTW, he left behind a wife, a 5 yr. old son, and 13 yr old daughter) really need to ask yourselves why you would be happy about the early death of a person who has made many positive contributions to this world. You are all -happy- because he DISAGREED with you... Is there something wrong with this picture??? YES! > How much "harm and suffering" has this ego called "Sagan the Astronomer" > caused among those unfortunate individuals who happen to be, like you, > in the wrong place at the right time? He has not helped solve the problem, > but instead, added to it. He cannot now change what has gone before him. > His mistakes<?> are recorded for all time in history, and there is no way for > him to make amends for them. PLEASE! This business of blaming Sagan for the misery of abductees is BS and you know it Mike. He was not a Psychologist or any other sort of mental health provider. He had no contact or involvement with abductees. This business of condemning anyone who does not follow the -party line- and saying anyone who does not take the -party line- is part of the UFO cover-up and will be punished is really self righteous and pompous. What if you people are wrong? What if these abductions are something else? Are you all going to hell because you did not make amends? What about all the good Carl Sagan did? > I pray that those who have suffered the most from his "attitude" will forgive > the most. Ignorance and desire for personal advancement and recognition > cause many of us to chose a path which can and often does lead us into > the darkness of the abyss, rather than into the light of the COSMOS. > In my opinion, this is what happened to Dr. Carl Sagan, "the Astronomer." Yes, and it is ONLY your opinion which is based in bias instead of HONEST investigation of the man's live and contributions. > I can not profess to say what "Carl Sagan, the Man" felt. I am and was > not familiar with that aspect of his personality. I guess you have not bothered to read anything about the man other than the bias written by true believers who want to silence ANY voice that disagrees. > Take care Jerry. May the Love of this Season bridge the abyss > which separates us from the Sun/Son of Knowledge and Light. That will only happen when we as Earth Family ACCEPT the fact our opinions are only that. It would require something called Brotherly Love... Julie
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com