Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Apr -> Taking Exception With A Comment

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Taking Exception With A Comment

From: Glenn Joyner <infohead@airmail.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:11:07 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 10:59:41 -0400
Subject: Taking Exception With A Comment

Dear Mrs. Clinton:

I do hope that this eventually does reach you, although I understand that you
likely have a staff dutied to the task of screening and reviewing the
probable plethora of messages daily directed to your attention.

This is in regard to a statement (and it's context) that you recently made...

While being questioned about a completely unrelated topic, you recently
made reference to people "obsessed" with UFOs.  This comment might not have
been as ill-received as it was (by MANY), if you had not delivered it with
a sarcastic tone, then laughed scornfully about the idea.

Your delivery of the comment does a great injustice to those who approach
the subject from a serious research and investigation point of view.  With
that one statement, you (who people respect and listen to) have relegated
the entire subject to the realm of lunacy, fantasy, gullibility, and those
feeble of mind.

It is true that a portion of the public might fit into one or more of the
personality types above.  Yes, unfortunately "UFOlogy" has its share of
those individuals (as do all societal fields of interest).  But by no means
can ALL interested in the subject be swept into these categories.

I am part of the "unseen" underlayer of serious, earnest, and discerning
researchers who are attempting to logically and realistically determine
answers to some very real and necessary questions about various aerial
phenomena.  We are loosely organized, by our interests only, across this
nation, as well as across the world.  I know that you are perceptive
enough to understand that I am not alluding to an "organization" per se.
Most of us are independents, who share a common interest.

It is a matter of high concern, to the group I describe, that the media
and our elected leaders treat the subject with such flippancy and brevity.
It seems that the huge bulk of media and official attention to the subject
is basically concerned with belittling and castigating those involved.  To
listen to those media and official channels, the average citizen would
almost certainly surmise that ALL of us in this field are "cultists,"
"eccentric," or just flat "loopy."

This is NOT the case, Mrs. Clinton.  We fully understand that the vast
high percentage of unidentified flying objects DO have a mundane and quite
logical explanation.  We are equally aware that many "sightings" are most
likely misidentifications of celestial bodies, satellites, aircraft, and
even occasional viewing of experimental (probably classified) vehicles.
There remains a small yet significant percentage of truly anomalous items;
those are the ones that have our attention.

I refer you to volumes of information, which originate directly from
government and military sources, which have come to light regarding the
above; most through Freedom of Information Act release.  And it is quite
interesting that so many of our civil, intelligence, and military agencies
have disavowed possession of material or even interest in the subject, when
queried, then to find documentation concerning such in released files, with
reference to other documents on the subject in as yet unreleased articles.
I certainly don't want you to think that I am approaching the "conspiracy"
idea, because that is not my aim at all.  I fully understand the concept
of national security and necessarily covert projects.  Much of this material
likely does directly concern national security, and any American should
respect that aspect of the subject.

Please consider that we in "UFOlogy" are not all the uneducated, misinformed,
and irrational individuals that you, from your statement, perceive us to
be.

My colleagues and I are sometimes busier debunking the rubbish, exposing
the charlatans and "disturbed," and attempting to rationally explain many
misconceptions than we would like to be.  That material DOES exist, we
cannot deny.  But to consign us ALL to the element consisting of the "UFO
nuts," the tragically misguided (as in the recent Heaven's Gate case), the
con artists and shysters, and those who have psychological aberrations is
quite narrow-minded, as well as a perceptual error.

Mrs. Clinton, please don't misconstrue this as disrespectful, but I must
consider that perhaps you are not in a position to truly comment on the
subject from an informed perspective.  It appears that you have only
been exposed to this material from the general media-perpetuated point of
view.  If you could find the time to investigate the flip side of that
media coin, you might find that the "study" of UFOs is not quite as
absurd as you seem to think.

If my perception of your attitude and stance on the subject is in error,
I humbly submit my deep and earnest apologies.  If it is not, then I invite
your comments and thoughts; I view you as an intelligent, logical, and
studious person and would be interested in your perspective.  In fact,
I invite your comments, whatever your point of view.  I will be copying
this letter to others in this field, and I am certain that all would be
fascinated with your input and address of the issue.

In closing, let me invite you to peruse our web site on this subject.  I
think you might be surprised at our attitude and disposition, as we present
a site that is pointedly devoted to exposing those who would exploit and
sensationalize the subject beyond credibility, as well as presenting the
most compelling cases of truly anomalous events.

I understand that the First Lady likely has little time for "surfing the
web," but I think you might reconsider and retract the statement that you
made, after understanding the serious side of this matter.  You won't find
any "Independence Day," "Star Trek," or other such fiction at our site, but
a surprisingly level-headed approach to the material.

We look forward to your response.

In high regard,

Glenn Joyner

Contact Information:

Glenn Joyner
P. O. Box 870891
Mesquite, Texas 75187-0891
E-Mail:   infohead@airmail.net
Fax:      (972) 686-4799
Web Site: http://ufo-world.simplenet.com





Search for other documents to/from: infohead

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.


[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.