Earth Aliens On Earth.com
Resources for those who are stranded here
Earth
Our Bookstore is OPEN
Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced!
Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New
Search... for keyword(s)  

Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Apr -> Rendlesham & 'Left at East Gate'

UFO UpDates Mailing List

Rendlesham & 'Left at East Gate'

From: "Mark Pilkington" <markp@syzygy.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 17:16:16 +0100
Fwd Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 02:06:17 -0400
Subject: Rendlesham & 'Left at East Gate'

 ----
>From: KRandle993@aol.com [Kevin Randle]
>Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 16:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Book: 'Left at East Gate'??

>I agree that the Bentwaters case is one of the best to come down the
>road in years. All I'm suggesting is that Larry Warren wasn't physically
>there during the two nights of the activity. It doesn't matter if it
>took 9 years or 9 minutes. If he wasn't there, he wasn't there.

Hello all,

I've been following the Rendlesham/Bentwaters discussion with
interest. It seems that what with the collapse of all the big
American cases, attention is now turning elsewhere. Well I'm afraid
the following is probably only going to stir up the already murky
waters some more, but this information is interesting and maybe
important.

I'll state my position, so that it is clear. I think that something
did take place at Rendlesham forest; it wasn't a lighthouse, it
wasn't the fantasy of some stoned or tripping troops or MPs (though
they may well have been stoned or tripping) and it wasn't the landing
of an ET space craft.

Until a year ago I lived in Norwich, Norfolk, less than an hour's
drive from the site in question, now disused. I got involved with the
Norfolk UFO Society in 1995; being part of a grassroots group such as
this is the best education into the colliding realities of UFO fact
and mythology that anyone can get.

Two of the members with whom I was friends were doing a great deal of
investigation into the Bentwaters/Rendlesham incident (BRI) and came
up with some intruiging and startling information. I'm working from
memory here, so I'll be talking in terms of "some" and "several"
rather than details, but the general impression should get the point
across.

This is what they uncovered: I make no claims as to its veracity, but
it does fit and they did a lot of research, speaking to a number of
people, including Larry Warren, who is almost certainly a liar.

First some info about the base:

It was a joint US/UK facility. It had the longest runway in West
Europe. It was illegally storing nuclear weaponry, apparently in a
large underground facility (no there weren't greys in it).

Whatever happened on the two or three nights in question, the base
was prepared for it:
--  US Space Command were stationed there for several weeks
beforehand, they specialise in the retrieval of objects from space.
-- Civilian shipping lanes off the coast were closed and made off
limits for several days around the time of the incident.

It is likely that something was brought down from orbit, probably a
Russian spy satellite, or perhaps a prototype vehicle of some sort.
This may have been the same object as was involved in the Cash
Landrum case in Texas, USA a day or two later.

Larry Warren:

The investigators met him, he toured them round the site, detailing
what happened. He claimed that he had suffered serious radiation
sickness and still did. He said his mother had the medical records.
She knew nothing about it when contacted.

Consider Charles Halt:

He went from Rendlesham to command an ever larger, nuclear capable
base in Germany.
If the Air Force didn't want him to be touring UFO conventions,
telling the familiar UFO/alien story, then he wouldn't have been
doing it. He certainly wouldn't have been promoted in such a manner.


My own suspicions are either that something was brought down, as
outlined earlier, or there was some sort of nuclear accident, or near
accident. Perhaps they were bringing in Cruise missiles illegally.
The forest area where the landing was supposed to have happened was
razed immediately afterwards, according to people who were there at
the time.

So it would seem that something unusual did take place, but once
again, the military are using the convenience of UFOs as a cover to
keep the event obscured by a cloud of delusion.


Mark Pilkington
Magonia online
http://www.netkonect.co.uk/d/dogon/index.htm
"Big words, smooth talking, BUT WHAT'S YOUR POINT?!"




Search for other documents to/from: markp | krandle993

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
[ This Month's Index | UFO UpDates Main Index | MUFON Ontario ]

UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304

A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.


[ UFO Topics | People | Ufomind What's New | Ufomind Top Level ]

To find this message again in the future...
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page.

Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not responsible for content.
Software by Glenn Campbell. Technical contact: webmaster@ufomind.com

Financial support for this web server is provided by the Research Center Catalog.