Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Apr -> Re: Lake Ontario Activity - Follow-up

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Alfred Breull <puma@hannover.sgh-net.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 23:51:12 +0200
Fwd Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:53:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Lake Ontario Activity - Follow-up

At 10:31 27.04.1997 -0400, you wrote:

>Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 12:54:29 -0500
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: jvif@spacelab.net (John Velez)
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Lake Ontario Activity - Follow-up

>>Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 17:37:22 -0400
>>From: Jennifer Jarvis <jarvis@globalserve.net>
>>To: Errol Bruce-Knapp <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Lake Ontario Activity - Follow-up

>>Hello List.

>>Well, here's a revelation!!!

>>Anyway, I never _did_ say that these were anything otherworldly,
>>just 'Unknowns', or 'Unconventionals'.  _Right_??

>No you didn't Jennifer, you only made it 'sound' that way! Are you
>connected with CSETI? Maybe I have your posts jumbled in my head
>with someone elses. But if I'm correct, then I understand completely
>how this could have happened. And BTW, your tone (above) is very
>reminiscent of a "young one" that has gotten into trouble and is
>trying to avoid being grounded! I have a 24 year old daughter and
>a 22 year old son, They'll tell you that I've never let *them* get
>away with such nonsense either. I don't care how old you are, you're
>grounded for one month! <G>

>>So, back to my normal life at last. Iguanas, birds, cats, cars,
>>crop circles, pub lunches....and on and on.

>Yes, please!

>*Last June I got photos of UFO's (at pretty close range
>too) that I waited three months to post. Why? Because I thought
>they should be analyzed by an expert or two before putting it
>out to the world as a "UFO". Wish everybody would do the same, I
>know it would save me an awful lot of valuable reading time! Don't
>take this personally Jennifer. It's just that the credibilty factor
>takes dive bombing drops everytime someone broadcasts UFO sightings
>in the heat or excitement of the moment without the benefit of more
>experienced eyes and minds. I'd rather hear about a single sighting
>a month after the fact, that has had some elements of the case
>verified, than hear about fleets of spectacular UFO's that turn out
>to be just another,...

>"never mind!"

>John Velez

---------------------------------------------------------

Hi, List:

I disagree with John. I prefer to support everyone, who is as encouraged and
enthusiastic as Jennifer, even if it turns out to be a false alarm.
Specially, if the person admits his/her error as soon as possible. Opposite,
real ufo pics waiting a month in some (expert's) box are a real waste of
time. All additional signs and/or evidences are 4 weeks old, vanished or
"dead" in the meantime, and witnesses had time enough to create phantastic
stories.

--Alf