Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Aug -> Re: Moore Denounces UFO Explanation Of Roswell

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: William.Hamilton@pcsmail.pcshs.com
Date: Monday, 11 August 1997 9:45am MT
Fwd Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 13:02:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Moore Denounces UFO Explanation Of Roswell

>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:01:12 -0400
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Moore Denounces UFO Explanation Of Roswell

>From: Stig_Agermose@online.pol.dk (Stig Agermose)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 14:19:06 +0200
>Subject: Moore Denounces UFO Explanation Of Roswell Incident

From: Saucer Smear, August 5 1997:


>"First, I completely agree with Jim Oberg's recent letter (as
>published in the last `Smear')**, especially his last two
>paragraphs, and I am glad somebody in a position of importance has
>finally come out and said it. As Mr. Oberg has indicated, there are
>a lot of stories hidden under that particular rug which would serve
>to illuminate many present mysteries.

>"Second, after deep and careful consideration of recent developments
>concerning Roswell, and because my name continues to be connected
>with this story, I wish to advise anyone who might be interested
>that I no longer am of the opinion that the extraterrestrial
>explanation is the best explanation for this event. I concede that
>it remains in the running as a possible explanation...

The implications of Moore's statements are vast.  I always remembered
when I wanted to investigste some hot story or location, he would try
to divert me and give me prosaic explanations.  He did this about
the sightings at Area 51.  He would suggest these were no more than
Air Force RPVs - he brought up this RPV explanation on more than
once occassion.

This is the first mention I have seen that he agreed with Oberg
on any subject.

His statement concerning the Roswell incident is telling.  Does it
also imply he no longer has any faith in what he was told by the
Aviary or the MJ-12 documents he touted?  Why is he so quiet and
secretive?

Oberg's statement below:

>"But don't stop merely with legalizing disclosure of all - if any -
>government secrets about `real UFOs'. I believe there is a far more
>valuable body of `secrets' that will help understand the decades of
>UFO phenomena that the world has experienced. This deals with
>government-related activities which directly or indirectly led to
>public perceptions that UFOs might be real when they weren't.
>Sometimes these actions were carefully orchestrated in advance;
>sometimes they were localized impromptu ad hoc damage-limitation
>tactics. But from my own experience, they seem to have played a
>tremendous and widely unappreciated role in inciting and enflaming
>public interest in UFOs while deflecting public attention from real
>highly-classified government activities.

Does this statement mean that Mr. Oberg was aware of these secret
government-related activities?  Is there a real justification in
keeping these activities secret today?  Were these activities
conducted over urban areas?  Why should we even believe there were
such secret activities or that they had any influence over inciting
enflaming interest in UFOs?  I think this whole statement is
unverifiable and has no bearing on public interest in UFOs unless
it can be proven.  It just seems like another smoke-screen.

Direct personal experiences, observations, protracted thought and
analysis reveals that the UFO phenomena is not a government-related
activity unless they have been doing some reverse engineering, but
reverse engineering of what if the Roswell object wasn't an
extraterrestrial spacecraft?  I think we should be asking why
there is all this effort and cover-up and debunking.  Is something
from out of this world so threatening?

Sincerely,

Bill Hamilton