UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: "S. Baldwin" <sblee@stc.net> Susan Baldwin Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 09:43:25 -0400 Fwd Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 00:20:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Rebecca Rants >> > From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net> >> > From: Mark Cashman <mcashman@ix.netcom.com> >> > From: Don Allen <dona@totcon.com> >> > From: Glenn Joyner <infohead@airmail.net> >> > Subject: Re: Rebecca Rants >piece about trace evidence. So why is anyone surprised when highly >sensational (and probably questionable) evidence is consumed and >preferred before serious and not-so-titillating evidence? > And, if the public is so willing to eat this stuff up, the law of >supply and demand enters the equation. Essentially, there's more on the >way. > I think another key is the inability of the American public to sustain >an interest in virtually anything for long periods of time. Flashy and >sensational entertainment is the order of the day. >focus is going to stay. It's bound to be frustrating for someone doing >not-so-sensational investigations to see their work taking a back seat >to someone claiming to have direct contact with the space brothers, for >instance. Rebecca Could it be the American public needs this flashy *out -there* UFO stuff because then it becomes unreal and can be dismissed. Unreal is so much easier to deal with than the thought of any of these sightings and abductions being an actual fact. When you make a joke or caricature of a subject that is frightening or incomprehensible it reduces it to a cartoon which is acceptable. When I try and talk to my more religious friends about these things their reaction is to either try and change the subject or put the issue in a religious context. If I start joking around about it it's ok, but getting serious is not......there is no neat little frame for them to put this information in and I think that frightens them. Until we have a something like a respected news paper with a regular column devoted to UFO events or some regular media event that has the guts to treat this as less than speculative and more of a ho-hum "they are here lets deal with it" we are going to get this "space brothers" stuff. If its any consolation, I guess we are in somewhat the same position as the bunch who first claimed the earth revolved around the sun. Imagine the jokes that were made about THAT one, and imagine the wing-nuts attached to the concept. Susan
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com