From: Gary Alevy <galevy@pipeline.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 21:50:26 -0400 Fwd Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 22:12:47 -0400 Subject: Re: PROJECT-1947 - Corso's Qualification Record > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 07:55:08 -0700 > From: jan@cyberzone.net (Jan Aldrich) > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: PROJECT-1947 - Corso's Qualification Record > > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 23:43:59 -0400 > > From: Gary Alevy <galevy@pipeline.com> > > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> > > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: PROJECT-1947 - Corso's Qualification Record > > > Speculation on what could, should or would have happen is > > > just that: speculation. > > > Best regards, > > > Jan Aldrich > > Judge ye, not that ye be judged. > Read that ye may know the truth, and the truth will set > you free. > Before you start with the Biblical scripture maybe you > ought to have a conference with your Rabbi. God expects > us to make judgements every day. Divine judgements are > left to the Divine. > BTW I make quite clear what is speculation and what > is fact. More than most people do in their posts. > > > Care to post your service record? > > To what effect? I have not made roaringly outrageous claims > about my Service. > >Would similar commentary apply? > What similar commentaries would apply? I am not claiming to > be a pivotal character in Western Civilization. Nor do I claim > my Service changed the course of histroy. Let's keep focused. > However, if my record is so important to ufology, I will be > happy to post it. Let's hear how important it is? I think > you will get no takers. > Jan "Keep Your Eye on the Ball" Aldrich Jan, I think I was being a bit unfair to you alone and I would like to ask you and everyone on the list to come clean with their various intelligence backgrounds. As a true private citizen I feel a bit overmatched by all the "spooky" background histories of the individuals running around in "ufology". The general readers, posters and lurkers of this list and may well wonder as I do why individuals with past or present intelligence affiliations have such an active participation in "ufology", a field which is thought of by the public as fringey or worse. For example how did your background or that of Karl Pflock lead you into this area? On the other hand as a matter of focus I don't see where Col. Corso has claimed to be a pivotal character in Western civilization, although Dennis Stacy has created the impression that he has made such a claim. One might instead argue that he was but a small cog in a well staffed, well funded organization or loosely associated operations. As an individual with experience in a Fortune 500 technical firm responsible for new product development, one thing I can tell you first hand is that the role Corso describes in technology transfer was significant but a snmall part of the overall process. Gary Alevy
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com