UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: "Jerry Cohen" <rjcohen@li.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 07:13:03 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 09:03:39 -0500
Subject: Oberg/Cooper rebuttal.3
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Oberg/Cooper rebuttal.3
continued from 2
----------------------------------
A researcher's response to James Oberg's:
"IN SEARCH OF GORDON COOPER'S UFOs"
by Jerry Cohen
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
DR. J. ALLEN HYNEK - His life and a few of his accomplishments
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Mimi, you don't know me, but this is for both of you. I felt I
owed him this.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Oberg has stated that Dr. Hynek wasn't careful in the data he
selected to be used in several of his books. To the best of my
awareness and research, no one that worked with Hynek on an
ongoing basis ever accused him of anything of this sort. If
anything, he was considered an extremely competent, cautious
scientist. To discover Dr. Hynek's competence and importance to
the field of UFOlogy, one must take a brief look at his life. I
had noticed several discussions on "alt.paranet.ufo" in which Dr.
Hynek had been referred to as a "failed scientist." I responded
with the information in the essay below.
As will be obvious to the reader, I had an emotional involvement
with this particular essay when I wrote it. I apologize for this.
It was due to two of my own UFO "experience(s)" back in 1967 which
left me trying to reconcile what my eyes saw but the main
scientific establishment and the Air Force were saying was
impossible. This is the reason for the in-depth research I have
performed all these years. Dr. Hynek's stand concerning the
subject was the only thing that allowed me to have some modicum of
peace throughout that search and not give up and begin to doubt
what my own eyes told me back then I would eventually find if I
looked long and hard enough.
The reason I am not going straight to the cases I originally
mentioned to present my argument concerning Gordon Cooper is
because even with the evidence staring one straight in the face,
almost any human being will still attempt to mentally discard it,
for to accept it is the opening of a very scary Pandora's box
indeed; a box that, once opened, can never be closed. However,
Dr. Hynek's revelations concerning the Air Force are extremely
important and allow one to more fully realize the incredible
strength of what I'm going to present. Many people today have
forgotten these revelations or are simply ignorant of their
existence. Therefore, a brief look at Hynek's life and
accomplishments MUST preface the evidence I've compiled.
First, let's see what this man set out to do with his life,
whether or not he accomplished it and also see how a combination
of fate and events caused him to eventually arrive at some
startling conclusions which the world has not yet fully absorbed
and understood.
J.C.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
***
J. Allen Hynek majored in astronomy and became a Professor of
Astronomy at Ohio State University. 1 No failure there...x years
of college and then got the job at Ohio State.
He must have done it well because he was invited by Fred
Whipple at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) to join
him so that Hynek could be "in charge of the Optical Satellite
Tracking Program (STP)", a new program which was to be part of the
67 nation scientific effort known as the International Geophysical
Year (IGY) to occur in 1957/58. As part of his responsibilities,
SAO was going to design & build 12 special tracking cameras to be
installed at optical tracking stations around the world to
specifically follow the U.S.' first artificial satellites. 2
The observatory also set up Operation Moonwatch, a global network
of volunteer observing teams. Moonwatch was to make the first
visual observations of the new satellites. "From this preliminary
information, STP in Cambridge would prepare orbit predictions for
the Baker-Nunn tracking stations so that the camera-telescopes
could be properly aimed to take precision photographs of the
artificial "moons." The photos were then returned to STP
headquarters at Cambridge, for reduction and analysis. 3
Hmmmn, very interesting. Of course, just about anyone could have
headed this project, but I guess they just had to be satisfied
with Dr. Hynek. P.S. We never heard any complaints from Fred
Whipple or the sponsors of the project. (NASA?)
Let's see....what else did he set out to accomplish? The Air
Force came to him and asked him to be their scientific consultant
on UFOs. He readily accepted this challenge and sought to perform
it to the best of his ability. His involvement with the Air
Force. dates back to 1948 when Project Bluebook was then called
Project Sign. 4 Again, THEY could have picked a lot of other
people, but, they didn't...they picked him. Did the Air Force
want to have everyone believing in UFOs? We all know the answer
to that one. I'm certain they stayed with him for the life of
Bluebook, at least partly, because he was a skeptic and
incidentally, an excellent scientist with an excellent "track
record." He set out to prove that UFOs were basically figments of
people's imagination. 5 Ooops! Guess what? I think we've
finally found something at which he did FAIL. He COULDN'T do it.
He couldn't prove that UFOs were figments of people's imagination.
Dr. Hynek discovered for himself that, no matter how hard he
tried, and for how long, there seemed to be a certain residual
number of UFO cases he could not totally dismiss. 6 Incidentally,
how long WAS he connected with this incoming data to the military?
... from 1949-1969, a total of 20 years! As far as I am aware,
the only civilian scientist to be in this unique position. 7
Hynek made the following comments in his 1972 book "The UFO
Experience." He found the following things to be true after
interviewing hundreds of people and/or reading and analyzing God
knows how many reports: The first..."the most coherent and
articulate UFO reports come from people who have not given much
thought to the subject and generally who are surprised and shocked
by their experience." Secondly, and as stated in a previous
post, "some of the very best reports have come from scientifically
trained people..... These reports are usually rarely published
however, because the person usually requests anonymity." 8
So then, how did Dr. Hynek handle this "failure" of his to
prove UFOs were figments of people's imagination? Did he try to
hide it by pretending that he had explained all the cases? That
certainly would have been easily accepted by the scientific
establishment. They could have all had a big chuckle together.
He would have been a hero to both the scientific establishment and
to the Air Force. He could have even easily taken the same
approach that Drs. Condon & Low took when handling the Colorado
Study. The road was already paved for a nice, safe exit from his
dilemma. The NAS (National Academy of Sciences) acceptance of the
Condon Study could have easily been Hynek's road map to safety.
But his own honesty and conscience prevented this. First of all,
he had a large number of cases he just couldn't explain;
Secondly, I'm sure history buffs will remember the cryptic memo
that Robert Low had written before the University of Colorado took
the project. Do we ALL remember what was in that memo that got
two scientists fired from the project for leaking it publicly?
As Walter Sullivan, New York Times Science Editor wrote in
his preface to the paperback version of "The Condon Report:" 9
"His (Low's) memo, to University officials, sought to analyze
the pros and cons of the Air Force proposal" (J.C. Do we also
remember, the Air Force was paying for the "Study"?)
"Could the University (of Colorado) undertake the project in
a manner that would satisfy public concern, yet not subject the
University to ridicule by the academic community? He argued that
the study would perforce be done almost entirely by non believers
and, and while the project could never "prove" that no UFOs have
ever come from another world, it could contribute impressive
evidence for such a conclusion."
'The trick,' he wrote, 'would be, I think, to describe the
project so that, to the public, it would appear a totally
objective study but, to the scientific community, would present
the image of a group of non believers trying their best to be
objective, but having an almost zero expectation of finding a
saucer."
Afraid of what the scientific community would think? Hand
picking the committee to skew the results? Skeptics who are
honest with yourselves, after reading this, do you truly think the
Colorado Study was given a fair chance to be objective?
Hardly.... The ONLY major university study of UFOs was a sham.
Hynek knew it. Instead of following the party line, Hynek stood
up and said firmly, Gentlemen, this is wrong! It needs studying
and no one has yet done a serious study on it. 10 For a scientist
to do this, it could have been the "kiss of death." He was trying
to "blow the whistle" but it was such a "way out" subject in
people's minds, almost no scientist in political power was
listening.
The ironic part is that Low botched the job and got caught.
Scientists, LOW hired, found and leaked the memo he wrote. 11
With all its mismanagement, the "Study" still found approximately
15% unknowns whereas the Air Force had its unknowns listed as low
as 6% in 1966. 12 Scientists like Dr. James McDonald, senior
physicist and professor of meteorology at the Institute of
Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona disputed the project's
findings stating correctly that its conclusions did not fit its
data. However, although the Study actually had more unknowns than
the Air Force had claimed in the first place and Condon who was
named in the Air Force contract as principal investigator did not
make a single field investigation of his own (whereas Hynek HAD on
many occasions), the National Academy of Sciences still accepted
his conclusion, most certainly because of his previously fine
reputation. Project Bluebook was closed and the sponsor of the
project, the Air Force was happy because it no longer had to deal
publicly with the UFO problem. It closed Project Bluebook in
1969. 13
Continuing our glimpse at Dr. Hynek's career....
What was Dr. Hynek's goal regarding UFOs at this point? It
was to somehow get the data he had accumulated from Project
Bluebook into the public spotlight in any way he could. He could
have run from the whole thing but he didn't. He was the only
civilian person that had the data and any ability to disseminate
it. He felt that the responsibility was on his shoulders. Since
Condon had said that nothing could be learned from studying UFOs,
the major scientific journals would not take Hynek's data
seriously. People had their mental "out." They didn't have to
think about it any more. But the UFO problem didn't just go away.
Good cases kept coming in and Dr. Hynek finally turned to
publishing his own books, risking scientific, political ostracism
in the process. One of those books was "The UFO Experience," from
which a small portion of the material for this article was
gleaned. 14 It is must reading for those interested in the
facts concerning the history of this controversial topic,
especially his 1968 letter to Colonel Raymond Sleeper in appendix
4, which exposes the total lack of applied scientific methodology
in Project Bluebook, ignoring of Hynek's scientific
recommendations and Bluebook's low place on the military totem
pole. 15
Not too long after the Pascogoula "Hickson & Parker" case,
Sherman Larsen came to him in 1973 and suggested that he form,
what turned out to be, a "Center for UFO Studies" (CUFOS) which
would be the first "serious" UFO study group "led by a scientist"
and "dedicated to research and analysis." 16 To quote Dr. David
Jacobs, the Center "quickly became a dominant force in UFO
research, drawing upon the investigative capabilities of the other
UFO organizations. With the editorial direction of Mimi Hynek,
CUFOS published monographs & research materials that could not be
published elsewhere because commercial and academic presses were
fearful that the subject would not sell or was too 'fringy'." 17
So, if skeptics wish to think Dr. Hynek was a "failed"
scientist, so be it. The facts speak otherwise. Nothing that he
did in the UFO field took away from his credibility as a fine
scientist and, he was brave enough to tread where others had
mortal fear. He still accumulated more prestigious
accomplishments than 99% of the critics that disagreed with what
he was saying. After reading the obituaries written in CUFOS
International UFO Reporter (May/June 1986), I realized that the
majority of people he worked with in virtually every facet of his
life respected him as an honest, intelligent, kind person, fine
teacher and conscientious scientist, including his wife Mimi, who
was his partner in life and knew him best. He had followed his
intellect and heart on this matter and in his death, certainly
deserves not to be maligned by ignorant comments.
Thanks to him, people who have had a legitimate UFO experience can
hold their heads up and say:
"THANK YOU DR. HYNEK FOR GIVING US BACK OUR SANITY AND RESPECT
WHEN OTHERS, WHO ARE IGNORANT OF THE SIMPLEST HISTORY REGARDING
THE UFO TOPIC, HAVE MADE PRONOUNCEMENTS CONCERNING SAME, BUT ABOUT
WHICH 'THEY' HAVE EXTREMELY MINUTE KNOWLEDGE.
YOU HAD COURAGE WHERE OTHERS HAD FEAR .. PLACED SCIENCE FIRST WHEN
OTHERS CHOSE POLITICS.
"SOME" OF US HAVE SEEN EXACTLY WHAT WE HAVE REPORTED AND OUR
REPORTS WERE ACCURATE AND HONESTLY GIVEN. AS YOU DISCOVERED, THEY
WERE NOT MISINTERPRETATIONS OF ANY NATURAL KNOWN PHENOMENA, NOR
DRAWN FROM ANY PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS STEMMING FROM US AND...
THEY (the reports) CERTAINLY DESERVE TO BE STUDIED IN DEPTH IN A
PROPER, SCIENTIFIC MANNER. WE ARE POSITIVE THAT FURTHER STUDY OF
UFOs WILL YIELD DISCOVERIES THAT MAN HAS ONLY HITHERTO IMAGINED.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FAITH IN US AS INTELLIGENT, OBSERVANT HUMAN
BEINGS. THANK YOU FOR GIVING US THE COURAGE TO STAND FAST IN WHAT
WE HAVE REPORTED. ONE DAY THE WORLD WILL REALIZE WE SAW EXACTLY
WHAT WE CLAIMED AND WE WILL BE TOTALLY VINDICATED.
Bibliography:
1 Hynek, J. Allen "The UFO Experience" (hard cover - jacket)
Henry Regnery Company 1972
2 Webb, Walter N . (Charles Hayden Planetarium, Boston) .
Center for UFO Studies "International Reporter" 1/93 . "Allen
Hynek as I Knew Him". p4 "Tracking Satellites"
3 Ibid : p4 . =B64
4 Hynek, J. Allen "The UFO Experience" (hard cover) Henry
Regnery Company 1972 . p1 . =B61 . "The UFO Phenomenon ...
Introduction: An Innocent in UFO Land"
5 Webb, Walter N . (Charles Hayden Planetarium, Boston) .
Center for UFO Studies "International Reporter" 1/93 . "Allen Hynek
as I Knew Him". p4 . =B66
6 Newsweek 10/10/66 . p70 . "UFOs for Real?" : Saturday Even
Post 12/17/66 . Hynek, J. Allen . "Are Flying Saucers Real?" pp.
17-21
7 Fox, Jack V. UPI New York . "Flying Saucers" . Look
Magazine . Cowles Communications, Inc. 1967 . p3 (picture &
information top-right corner) : Washington Post . 3/25/66 Fri .
UPI "New Flying Object Seen in Michigan" : Ibid 3/26/66 . Simmons,
Howard . "Flying Objects Identified as College Pranks and Swamp
Gas" : Ibid 4/6/66 Drummond, Roscoe . "UFOs--Real or Myth"
8 Hynek, J. Allen "The UFO Experience" (hard cover) Henry
Regnery Company 1972 . pp. 9&10
9 Sullivan, Walter (Preface to) Condon, Dr. Edward U. :
Scientific Study of UFOs, New York: Bantam Books 1969 (A New
York Times Book) also... Hynek, J. Allen: The UFO Experience,
Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1972 . p 210 bottom and 211 . hard
cover . "Science is not Always what Scientists Do"
10 Newsweek 10/10/66 . p70 . "UFOs for Real?" : Saturday Even
Post 12/17/66 . Hynek, J. Allen . "Are Flying Saucers Real?" pp.
17-21
11 Hynek, J. Allen: The UFO Experience, Chicago: Henry
Regnery Co., 1972 . p 210 bottom and 211 . hard cover . "Science
is not Always what Scientists Do"
12 "The U.F.O. Investigator", National Investigations
Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) publication, May/June 1968,
pp. 1/4-5 : Evening Star 3/23/66 . "UFO Manifestation on Rise
Since July" . col 3 . =B66 "Quintanilla reported much more precise
data in the Air Force's files.....Project Blue Book had received
10,147 reports since its inception in 1947. Of these 646 remain
resolved." : McDonald, Dr. James E., NICAP UFO Investigator,
Feb/Mar 1969, "A Scientist's Critique" (Excerpts from 2/12/69 talk
to the DuPont Chapter of the Scientific Research Society of
America.)
13 Newsweek Magazine 12/29/69 "Closing the Blue Book"
14 Hynek, J. Allen: The UFO Experience, Chicago: Henry
Regnery Co., 1972
15 Ibid: appendix 4 (Excerpt of a Letter from J. Allen Hynek
to Colonel Raymond S. Sleeper)
16 Larsen, Sherman . CUFOS International UFO Reporter .
May/June 1986 . pp 13/14 . "The Founding of CUFOS"
17 Jacobs, David M., CUFOS International Reporter . May/June
1986, "J. Allen Hynek and the UFO phenomenon"
------------------------------------------------------------------
=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D
Some additional comments by:
Walter Webb, astronomer, Charles Hayden Planetarium, Boston
=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D=3D+++=3D=3D
J.C. To input some data concerning the question I mentioned
earlier; "Are there any other respected scientists that analyzed
UFOs and became seriously interested in them?" Here is another
scientist who's interest in UFOs began in the same year my
interest began..1957.
Posted on alt.paranet.ufo on Feb. 6, 1996
The following information was written for CUFOS
International UFO Reporter (1/93), approximately 6 years after
Hynek's death. The article was titled "Allen Hynek As I Knew
Him." Its author was Walter Webb, an astronomer at Charles Hayden
Planetarium, Boston. Webb had worked for Dr.Hynek beginning in
February 1957 when Dr. Hynek was setting up tracking stations for
the Smithsonian Astronomical Observatory. Hynek had hired Webb as
a kid out of college sometime that February.
+ + +
His job was to generally assist the STP staff at the
Smithsonian. After Sputnick II went up, the rush was on to get
observers to their tracking stations. Webb got an assignment on a
station atop 10,000 ft. Mount Haleakala on Maui, Hawaii. Their
station became the first one overseas to be equipped and staffed.
Webb saw Hynek almost every day during that time.
Webb said that he realized there was a core of difficult UFO
cases that couldn't easily be explained when he was at Hynek's
house one evening in 1957 and Hynek was cheerfully explaining away
some sighting reports to students, etc. and came to the following
case: "an object approached a pilot on a collision course,
veered, paralleled the plane and then shot upward, joined another
object, and streaked away." Webb jotted this case in his diary.
It turned out to be the initial spur to Webb's own curiosity
regarding the topic.
Webb eventually became a scientific advisor to NICAP and good
friend of Richard Hall, editor of "The UFO Evidence"; former
Assistant Director and Acting Director of NICAP. As previously
mentioned, "The UFO Evidence was a 200,000 word documentary report
which contained approximately 746 documented sightings by Air
Force, Army, Navy & Marine people, pilots and aviation experts,
other military personnel, observations by professional scientists
and engineers, including astronomers and aeronautical engineers,
which had been presented to congress in 1964. Hall now
contributes to every major UFO organization in the United States.
Webb's name appeared on the inside front cover of "The UFO
Evidence" as one of a group of Special Advisors (Science &
Technology) to NICAP.
****
This is what Webb said, in his own words. Interior capitals are
mine.
"....occasional anomalous trails showed up on later photos in the
Baker-Nunn network. Bud (Ledwith) started to examine both
tracking station film and Moonwatch reports for UFO traces. Hynek
did comment on 'oddities' that appeared on both the tracking
photos and Moonwatch observations."
"I certainly know that in the satellite tracking mission we got a
number of things that appeared on the films that were never
tracked down; they weren't part of the mission! A PERSON WHO SAYS
THAT THE BAKER-NUNN CAMERAS NEVER PICKED UP ANYTHING IS JUST DEAD
WRONG BECAUSE I KNOW THEY DID.. I WAS IN CHARGE OF THE PROJECT!
We just didn't bother about it. It would have been too much work
to investigate some strange lights; it would have diverted men
from the job they were supposed to do. . . . "
"We received many reports from our Moonwatch stations concerning
the strange lights that certainly weren't satellites. Many of
these witnesses were amateur astronomers and generally well
acquainted with the skies."
****
So we see why yet another scientist became interested in UFOs.
Something was being seen and some scientists themselves were
becoming curious.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hynek quote from 1st page of "The Hynek UFO Report"
"I had started out as an outright 'debunker,' taking great joy in
cracking what seemed at first to be puzzling cases. I was the arch
enemy of those 'flying saucer groups and enthusiasts' who very
dearly wanted UFOs to be interplanetary. My own knowledge of those
groups came almost entirely from what I heard from Blue Book
personnel; they were all "crackpots and visionaries.'"
Hynek, J. Allen . "The Hynek UFO Report" . Dell Publishing Co. 1977
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hynek quote from "The UFO Experience"
"Before I began my association with the air force, I had joined my
scientific colleagues in many a hearty guffaw at the "psychological
postwar craze" for flying saucers that seemed to be sweeping the
country and at the naivete and gullibility of our fellow human
beings who were being taken in by such obvious "nonsense." It was
almost in a sense of sport that I accepted the invitation to have a
look at the flying saucer reports....."
Hynek, J. Allen: The UFO Experience, Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.,
1972 . Part 1 The UFO Phenomenon . Introduction: An Innocent in UFO
Land . paragraph 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------
JC: As evidence of how the many years Dr. J. Allen Hynek studied
the topic eventually changed his thinking, here are some quotes from
his forward to Fawcett and Greenwood's "The UFO Cover-up"
(Fireside books, Simon & Schuster 1984), two years before his death.
***
Date: 6 Feb 1996 04:29:14 GMT
Organization: LI Net (Long Island Network)
Lines: 48
"Experienced UFO investigators have, over the years, been the
recipients of many tales and undocumented statements, generally
from former military pilots and crew members about having their
aircraft "scrambled" (launched in immediate response to an alarm)
to pursue a UFO, of UFOs encroaching on high-sensitivity areas on
military base, of malfunctions of defense equipment in the
presence of UFOs, of planes lost while pursuing UFOs, and, yes,
even tales of crashed saucers and of alien beings kept in the deep
freeze." ......
"Now, however, documentation which puts the UFO--U.S.
government controversy in quite a new light has become available.
The authors have made revealing use of documents released through
the mechanism of the Freedom of Information Act and other data
which have been made available to them, often through private
sources, which show that the CIA and NSA protestations of
innocence and lack of interest in UFOs are nothing short of
prevarication."
"The reader must judge for himself or herself just how far
these implications extend, but certainly no one can deny any
longer that various intelligence agencies of our government were
long cognizant of UFOs and the global extent of this phenomenon.
Official dispatches from our embassies and air bases in other
countries to these agencies, to the State Department, and even, on
occasion, to the White House, bear incontrovertible witness to
this."
"For the government to continue to maintain that UFOs are
nonexistent in the face of the documents already released and of
other cogent evidence presented in this book is puerile and in a
sense an insult to the American people."
--
JC: From the quotations I have presented to this point, we can
note the dramatic change in Hynek from skeptic to believer. However
he did not always believe the Air Force and government was
purposely hiding information. Certain specific things Hynek
discovered along the way in his research precipitated this change.
At this point we need to examine UFO history as a background to
the discoveries he made concerning UFOs and the Air Force.
Oberg/Cooper rebuttals 4 & 5 will cover this and more in depth.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
End: Oberg/Cooper rebuttal.3
----------------------------------
DR. J. ALLEN HYNEK-
His life and a few of his accomplishments
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Cohen
Email: rjcohen@li.net
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com