Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Feb -> Re: Autopsy Cameraman photos

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: BOB SHELL <76750.2717@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 14 Feb 97 10:15:43 EST
Fwd Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 02:27:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Autopsy Cameraman photos

>From: "SyntaX" <wsawers@ihug.co.nz>
>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Autopsy Cameraman photos
>Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 11:41:03 +1300


William,

I have not yet seen the first autopsy on video, but I do have some still images
from it.  While the quality is not very good, they are good enough to indicate
that the structure of the creature inside the "genital" slit is decidedly
non-human.  There do not appear to be any labia minora, and in the one image in
which this area is focused on it looks as though there are two small openings
side by side about where the urethral opening would be in a human, and one large
opening below where the vaginal opening would be in a human.  If this is
correct, it would possibly imply direct elimination of urine from each kidney
and possibly no urinary bladder.  Of course that is all based on a mammalian
model, and some features of these creatures are more reptilian than mammalian.

So we have something with no navel, no nipples, and decidedly non-mammalian
"genitals".  If a human/dinosauroid hybrid was possible, this is what I would
expect it to look like.  Other reptilian/dinosauroid features are almost total
lack of subcutaneous fat, smooth brain lacking gyri and sulci, lack of facial
musculature, shape and location of liver, and I'm sure there are others.

The exceptionally large eyes would imply evolution in a dimly lighted place or
nocturnal/crepuscular lifestyle.  Dark eye lenses would be necessary for
something adapted this way to see in normal earth daylight.

Bob