Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Feb -> Re: Good, Oechsler, Inman & 'Cosmic Journey'

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Armen Victorian <106105.3217@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 11:39:11 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 12:21:01 -0500
Subject: Re: Good, Oechsler, Inman & 'Cosmic Journey'

The format of the article published in your recent posting, as acknowledged
by yourself, was not edited version of the same, which further to
subsequent etion was published in LOBSTER UK.

Limited numbers of that version was mailed to selected public figures in
the UFO field, for their information. However, as further acknowledged in
your posting, some requested the re-mailing, which was granted.

Nevertheless, the bulk of our research which constitutes trips to US and
taped telephone conversations with  the individuals named in Mr. Good's
piece are in our archives. Due to large volume of our findings, there and
after the publication of the report, still remains unpublished to date. Some
of which are direct comments made by key individual [players] as named in
Mr. Good's piece, holding high ranking offices, to their counterparts in
UK, in particular Hill-Norton.

A brief example; is what one key, high ranking US Navy individual, who
addressed Hill-Norton, with personal tone,  commented as being senile and
short sighted in his foreword in Mr. Good's book.

I further concur with your opening comments concerning the mislead of
interested public  by some publicly well-known [research] individuals, for
whom the business aspect and the enjoyed dividends, take priority to
serious research.

As one Air Force General commented to me a couple of years ago in Pentagon;
" ... we do not have to create as much disinformation as we initially intend
to, since we enjoy the full cooperation of your researchers at large with
their frequent publications" - a point I have to agree with.

Consequently, and in an attempt to avoid the regular UFO circus, I seldom
share significant information with public researchers, who have a generic
tendency of self belief in knowing all.

These comments should not be construed as criticism in any rate by our
learned public researchers in these field. Neither it intends to open a
venue in entering into the current arena.  And as always, I wish them all
good luck in their efforts in unlocking the"mysteries unknown".

Armen Victorian