Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Feb -> Re: Aurora and Dark Star

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: jan@cyberzone.net (Jan Aldrich)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:37:21 -0800
Fwd Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 11:58:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Aurora and Dark Star

UFO UpDates - Toronto wrote:


Hello Errol and All,

   Sorry to resurrect this old post.  I had marked it
for comment at the time.


> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 22:40:29 -0600
> From: Tim Joiner <tjoiner@flash.net>
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: Aurora and Dark Star
>
> Maybe someone can use this information...
>
> I was watching TLC a couple of weeks ago and they showed some video
> that they speculated might be the Aurora aircraft, due to the
> unusual appearance of the contrail. They also showed a fellow
> (in Texas, I think?) that claimed to have monitored transmissions
> from this plane as it flew overhead. He said that he heard the
> plane referenced as "Dark Star."


If it were not for a constant stream of rumors, where
would these junior James Bonds be?  We supposedly have
a test of a Top Secret device, but here are the pilots
talking in the "clear."  Since every radio in the military
now has an encryption device, the incident as discribed is
highly unlikely.  Even if they were talking in the
"clear" does it seem logical to refer to something by a
supposedly highly classified name?

It seems that the more unlikely a story, and the more
leaps of faith required, the more ready people are to
believe it.

> A few nights later another show (Discovery Channel?) featured a
> new remote-controlled experimental plane, and it was shown in
> flight, along with it's accompanying chase plane. It was referenced
> as "Project DarkStar.
>
> I doubt there's a connection, but I'll hunt up what I can.


My question is why bother?


Jan Aldrich