You forgot "www." at the beginning of the server name! You have accessed this page though an incomplete server name: ufomind.com instead of www.ufomind.com --- so some services may not work. Please go to the correct address for this page to make this message go away.

Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Feb -> Here

From: Steven Kaeser <skaeser@konsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:46:30 -0500
Fwd Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:03:05 -0500
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy fake sites

> >From: Jere Lawrence <jerel@mpx.com.au>
> >To: "'updates@globalserve.net'" <updates@globalserve.net>
> >Subject: Alien Autopsy fake sites.
> >Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:11:01 +-1100

> >Oh dear, the most compelling evidence I ever found was on
> >www.bufora.org.uk. Upon trying to go back their to get the exact
> >page reference, the sight is either down or gone.

> Try searching on BUFORA.  I think they changed their Internet
> domain name.

> >( * SIGH * )

> >They had actual photographs of the FX dummy used to create the
> >video. I once posted the exact address to this list. The message
> >never arrived though and my sent logs are long since deleted.

> >( * BIG SIGH * )

> >If anyone else had any pictures about the Autopsy dummy (The
> >picture is of it being spray painted for the video) please give
> >me a web page reference.

Jere-

Those wanting to locate the British UFO Research Organization WEB site
can try:

http://www.bufora.org.uk/

I would note that the BUFORA site has not taken a stand, one way or the
other, regarding the Santilli "film", as they appear to be willing to
provide both sides in this debate space for their views.  Another link
at their site will take you to an article written by Philip and Susan
Mantle, who apparently believe in the "film"s authenticity:

http://www.bufora.org.uk/times/article/a5.htm

For many this debate had dragged on far too long, and they would prefer
to reach a conclusion and move on.  This is a position that is
completely understandable.  The

http://www.trudang.com/autopsy.html

site initially acknowledged that they were only showing how the "film"
could have been faked, and were not trying to prove that it was
actually done that way.

Of course, failing to absolutely prove it to be fake does not directly
lend credibility to the "film".  Proving the "film's" provenance is the
key, and so far that has proven to be impossible.