Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: Shell Responds to Chapman's 'Strange' Article

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Business to Business Magazine (Michael Malone)" <btbmag@ro.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 04:52:23 -0600 (CST)
Fwd Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:34:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Shell Responds to Chapman's 'Strange' Article

> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:52:54 -0800
> From: Ed Stewart <egs@netcom.com>
> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Shell Responds to Chapman's 'Strange' Article
> References: <2.2.32.19970102221512.0074f8fc@mail.globalserve.net>

*Major Snip*

> Until such time that real film is presented for analysis and not
> generational copies made from video, the entire matter should be
> regarded as fraud perpetrated to exploit the gullibility of the UFO
> community. And the people that have been promoting it should be
> considered as willing participants in the promotion of fraud.

> Any claim where the claimants are not willing to provide the necessary
> genesis and provenance to establish the validity of the claim should be
> regarded as false when confronted with conflicting evidence that has
> genesis and provenance established. And such claims should not be the
> focus of research until such time that the genesis and provenance of the
> claim is established by the claimants.

> Ed Stewart

Well said.  Well said indeed.

Kudos to you, Ed.