Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Lord Hill-Norton's NEXUS Vol 3 No.6 Oct - Nov 96

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: armen victorian <106105.3217@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:46:18 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:44:54 -0500
Subject: Lord Hill-Norton's NEXUS Vol 3 No.6 Oct - Nov 96

I got to know Hill-Norton during the review of Good's alien liaison.[See
Lobster 23].

His foreword seemed to have un-necessarily upset some of his own
colleagues - ADM Bobby Inmann, and RADM Sumner Shapiro [both well-known
in intelligence circles].

Hill-Norton's response, and his knowledge of ufo's [taped conversation]
was [and maybe still is] limited to what Good and then Oechsler used to
feed him.

In the course of one conversation Hill-Norton called Inman and Shapiro
liars. Shapiro's [ex-ONI director] response [taped-conversation] was that
as sad as it is for a fellow colleague; Hill-Norton seems to becoming
senile. A point on which I tend to concur with Sam to some extent.

Hill-Norton also failed to answer to some serious questions put to him,
whilst both his colleagues and many others, allegedly involved in Cosmic
Journey - another blockbuster for Good - answered my correspondence, and
later in the course of my trips to The Pentagon, we met, to further iron
out discrepancies there.

The public loves sensation - fiction - doomsday material, and there are
many who are glad to oblige and enjoy from the derived benefits as well as
profit.

RE: Rockefeller's report

I could mail this substantial report, sent to me long ago - if there
is an absolute need. It did not impress me. Regurgitated old material.
R. seem to be playing his role pretty well - keeping both camps happy.

RE: C. Sagan.

I concur with Mr. Shell's comment.
A little BI would be rewarding Mr. Shell.

A. Victorian