Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: The Two Faces of Ufology

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: XianneKei@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 13:34:41 -0500 (EST)
Fwd Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:38:36 -0500
Subject: Re: The Two Faces of Ufology

>  Date: 15 Jan 97 14:57:49 EST
>  From: BOB SHELL <76750.2717@CompuServe.COM>
>  To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>  Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: The Two Faces of Ufology

> (Note to Rebecca:  You say "Considering the source of the message, it
> angered me."  Why should a message from me specifically anger you?  Do
> I make you mad merely by existing?  I thought we were well past that
> stage in our relationship.
> I accept you for who and what you are, and thought you had decided to
> extend the same courtesy to me.  You are a good researcher, and I'd
> like to be on good terms with you.)


Thanks for the compliment which considering the source is not worth squat.
Just kidding Bob. NO, you do not anger me merely by existing... it is just
the fact that you exist which angers me. Just kidding again.

You know there is really no tactful way for me to answer this. I have tried
about 10 times and can't think of the appropriate words to dance around the
issue. <g>

I like you Bob, I like lots of people. But that does not mean that I believe
or trust everything they say. I'm sure you have found yourself in a similar
situation before. Maybe I showed poor judgment by stating "considering the
source" so publicly. But FWIW, it's the truth, as I see it.

Nothing personal though. You're still a nice man.  And I really do like you.
Maybe we could play poker sometime. <g>

Rebecca

ps. Here's some extra g's for you to put wherever you like in this message.
<g> <g> <g> <g> <G> <G> <G> <G>

Hope that is enough.