Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: 'Gravity Shield Effect Confirmed!'?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: James A Diss <76710.234@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 21 Jan 97 13:53:46 EST
Fwd Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 09:56:56 -0500
Subject: Re: 'Gravity Shield Effect Confirmed!'?

>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'Gravity Shield Effect Confirmed!'?
>Date: Sun, 19 Jan 97 12:14:15 -0600
>From: Pat Parrinello <pparri@republic.net>
>To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>

Pat Wrote;

>One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions.

When I wrote, 'but proposed little that could be tested', I think you
misunderstood.

Rather than read about topographical (read: mathematically theoretical)
constructs that can become resonating circuits (LC; from
Inductor(L)/Capacitor(C)), and _may_ produce field structures (the 'field' being
a set of abstracted point sources to provide a model of potentials in _any_
sphere of science), I was actually asking for a test to prove the existence of
such.

Proving the hypothesis with exemplars, so to speak.

Apologies for the brackets, but I have an aversion to the way some things sound
without explanations.  Bull**it baffles brains, you know? <wink>

>*IF* they are getting "reduced weight" as advertised

Advertised?

Foundations of Physics, 6:4, 1993
Phys. Rev D, 43:457, 1991
Phys. Rev B, 46:5489, 1992
Phys. Rev D, 15:2047, 1977

That's the basis, although I'm not quoting most of the papers I have here.

If you take a look, there is mention of a many particle system, which could
match yours.

>then
>the reason will be found to be vector excitation and that
>is induced gravitational effect, and NOT sheilding.

Perhaps, but then you're supplying answers before the tests have been completed.
I recall a Philip Klag...no, Klash....Erm, Klass? Doing the same closed minded
rubbishing of stuff before it became public domain.

>There is a vast difference in 'saying' and knowing.

And you 'know', right?

So why is your stuff on a web page and not Phys Rev?

>> Is that person you see when you look at 'yourself' in
    a mirror, you?  The point is... Suppositions are a virtual
    image of the mind.  Reality cannot change at all for it
    is real. The mind, on the other hand, does change. <<

    Pat, weasel words.  What I see in the mirror is a collection of interpreted
images that may or may not be me.  However, it's useful for squeezing zits and
trimming the beard.

James D,