Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Autopsy Cameraman photos

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: yogi@iadfw.net
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:11:37 -0600
Fwd Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 10:00:52 -0500
Subject: Autopsy Cameraman photos


Errol and all,

It's no secret that most of us here on the list have seen the Santilli
alien autopsy CAMERAMAN photos that have been floating around in
cyberspace.
I
'm surprised that there hasn't been any discussion about them here
except for a short blurb by Bob Shell.

I read in a post from Bob that this is the man who claimed to have
filmed the alien autospy, but that he is not Jack Barnett. Maybe Bob
would like to comment further about these photos.  What is Ray's reaction to
them being sent all over the internet? I'm also curious to learn if Bob has
seen the actual video of the interview with this alleged cameraman.

My observations... The man in the photos seems to be wearing glasses in
the enhanced photo, but doesn't seen to be wearing any in the unehanced
photo.

I wonder...did he remove his glasses during the interview or am i wrong
about the no glasses? It also looks to me like he has either a mole or
some kind of growth on the right side of his face near the mouth. What is
that? The man in the photo looks like he could be 80 to me.

I think this might turn out to be the first REAL lead we've had on this
controversial issue in a long time.  I think that learning the identity
of this alleged cameraman might possibly be our last chance to learn the
truth and genesis of this film.

What do you think?

Regards,
Bill Ralls