UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: MAC TONNIES <0212104@ACAD.NWMISSOURI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 10:24:32 -0600 (CST)
Fwd Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 14:01:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Bodies recovered at Roswell: alien fakes?
Bob Shell writes (1/22/97):
>Hi Mac,
>Nice to see someone who is really thinking about this. I speculated back in
>1995 that these things might be "biots" or biological robots, based on their
>apparently simplified internal structure and the lack of gyri and sulci on the
>brain. Using a mammalian model, a creature with a smooth brain like this could
>not be particularly smart. That is still one possibility of what these beings
>are.
[...]
>To me one of the most interesting things is that prosthetic device removed from
>the heart, which several thoracic surgeons have identified as an artificial
>heart valve. Both bodies have it, and neither one has a scar on the chest from
>its implanting. This implies that these creatures are "manufactured", as also
>does the lack of navel.
Note: The artificial heart valves may have been designed to help the creatures
survive harsh acceleration.
>When we were first getting into space we sent up monkeys and chimps as test
>subjects before we sent up the first humans. We considered them similar enough
>to us, but expendable. If we could have manufactured biological robots, might
>these not have been our first choice?
>It has been argued that these creatures look "too human" to be ET. I agree. I
>think their origin is 100% terrestrial. I suspect that DNA tests have now been
>done and have verified that their basic DNA is human, although either
>artificially modified by genetic engineering or hybridization. Where do I
>think they came from? I think they most likely came from the distant future
>or past, in other words that they are temponauts not astronauts.
Bob--
Thanks for your thoughts on this!
On "temponauts": I think this theory has a lot going for it, if the AA footage
is genuine. Maybe these entities were being used at some point to study the
biological effects of time travel on human-like subjects. The fact that they
crashed indicates that the form of travel utilized was potentially hazardous,
which might account for the apparent new UFO designs seen after 1947 (I'm
postulating for the time being that the vehicle that crashed was
crescent-shaped, like the craft sighted by Kenneth Arnold; please see the
alleged gun-camera photo at http://www.strieber.com ). It's interesting to
wonder if the civilization that sent these "biots" knew that one of their
missions was going to crash, since the event would have taken place in its own
remote (or not so remote) past.
Of course, the creatures' "humanity" doesn't necessarily mean that they're
"100% terrestrial." Perhaps genuine aliens were experimenting with humanoid
bodies for some reason we can only guess at.
****************************************************************
Mac Tonnies * #415 Franken Hall, NWMSU * Maryville, MO 64468
(816) 562-6488 * E-mail: 0212104@acad.nwmissouri.edu
Web: www.nwmissouri.edu/~0212104/apu.html
"Today's Abstractions are Tomorrow's Archetypes"
****************************************************************
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com