Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: The Linda Case -- again

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Steven J. Powell" <sjpowell@access.digex.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 14:06:27 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 11:28:02 -0500
Subject: Re: The Linda Case -- again

>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 20:21:09 -0500
>From: Greg Sandow <GSANDOW@prodigy.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: FO UpDate: Re: The Linda Case -- again

>> Look for information in the letters that _post-dates_ any other
>> information.

>Would you explain this a little more?
>[part of john's answer snipped]

>>Its possible that the
>> letters may contain a 'slip,' a mistake that would not have been noticed at
>> the time but may be noticed now that the information flow is old and mostly
>> stopped.  Maybe something mentioned in the letters that became a lead for
>> other information, maybe something mentioned that was 'out of sequence.'
>> Does that make sense?

>Makes perfect sense. I haven't found anything like that, though.

That's good.

>>a handwriting analysis might show that different letters were
>> from possibly the same author although with such a small sample that would
>> only be highly circumstantial at best.

>Right, examining the letters can't prove anything for sure. There's very
>little handwriting involved, almost none. But the letters allegedly from
>the several parties do show consistencies in spelling, formatting,
>punctuation, grammar, diction, tone....that is, consistencies within
>each writer's letters, and marked differences between them. And there's
>quite a lot of material.

Do you also have the envelopes for each letter?  How do the envelopes look?
 Same stamps, how are they addressed, etc.?