Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: Bodies recovered at Roswell: alien fakes?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: MAC TONNIES <0212104@ACAD.NWMISSOURI.EDU>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 14:12:14 -0600 (CST)
Fwd Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 11:36:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Bodies recovered at Roswell: alien fakes?

Jorgen Westman writes:

>Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 08:49:32 +0100
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Jorgen Westman <wufoc@wufoc.com>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Bodies recovered at Roswell: alien fakes?

>>Gentlemen, before we go on theorizing about WHAT these things are in
>>the "supposed footage" of the Alien autopsy, perhaps we should try
>>verifying the authenticity of the creatures as being something that
>>were NOT created by us (humans) to dupe other humans. <snipped>

>>David (Furry) Furlotte

>David - I couldn't have said it better myself!
>This is a major problem throughout the whole UFO-field.
>When things can't be verified as genuine or not people start to
>act as it doesn't matter and get around to verifying details in the
>"unspecific" photo, film etc. I think we all need to freshen up
>here and get tougher. Always start at the beginning and if you
>can't verify the cause of the case, everything afterwards is plausability.

>Jorgen / WUFOC

Jorgen and David--

Your point is well taken. Believe me when I say that I know
exactly what you mean. Leaping to wild conclusions can indeed
be dangerous. But I stand by my statement that _some_ cautious
speculation can actually assist in an investigation. For example,
Bob Shell mentioned a thoracic surgeon identifying the creatures'
prosthetic device as an artificial heart valve. No matter its
purpose, its presence on the AA footage can perhaps tell us many
things: If it's a hoax, then the hoaxers apparently had access to
artificial heart valves, implying that they had some sort of medical
affiliation (?). If the glutinous innards of the dissected creature
are indeed consistent with a high-speed air collision, could a
similar effect be achieved using some other method, such as a
centrifuge?

In short, the points raised in our speculative dialogue (points
I haven't heard elsewhere, I might add) actually provide some
telling (if vague) clues that might be able to get to the bottom
of the footage's authenticity.

Sincerely,
Mac Tonnies