Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jan -> Re: 'Electrically Induced Hallucinations'

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Steven J. Powell" <sjpowell@access.digex.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:24:07 -0500
Fwd Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 13:30:22 -0500
Subject: Re: 'Electrically Induced Hallucinations'

>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: 'Electrically Induced Hallucinations'
>Date: Sun, 26 Jan 97 12:34:43 -0600
>From: Pat Parrinello <pparri@republic.net>
>To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>

>   John Powell, relisher of fine Texas Gulf Coast Seafood, said;

(Most assuredly!)

>>Although folks who think everything odd in the sky is an alien spaceship
>>coming to probe their anus are probably quite upset at the attention TST
>>is getting.
>   I'm not upset, I'm fascinated.

Same here.  A couple of years ago I was set upon by several rabid ETH
supporters because I mentioned the statistical concurrance between
geomagnetic activity and subsequent UFO sighting reports.  Not wanting to
be gang-mugged by these frisky followers of aliens <grin> I casually
mentioned that _maybe_ the alien propulsion system _caused_ some
geomagnetic activity in certain areas...

For all I know that may even be true...

The _only_ thing we presently know is that there _is_ a reliable,
statistically significant, and very interesting concurrance.

My _personal_ opinion is that geomagnetic activity probably does explain
the great majority of _simple_, short-duration, non-descript DDs and NLs.
Which is fine anyway since by definition these simple, short-duration and
non-descript DDs and NLs don't look good in a high-detail multi-observer
database and (hopefully) aren't the stuff we want to explain/understand first.

I should also point out that the best UFO flaps on record are probably _not
in any way_ connected with geomagnetic activity: Gulf Breeze, Belgium,
Bentwaters, the 1947-era, Husdon Valley, (and others I can't remember right
now).

>   And, John...  Is you abduction insurance paid up? :)

You bet.  As Duke would say, "Come and get some."

>   Watch your... uh... dietary habits!

Hahaha!