Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Bursting the Balloon

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Andromeda0@aol.com [Jared Anderson]
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 05:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Fwd Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 20:56:32 -0400
Subject: Bursting the Balloon

If anyone needs a good laugh they can goto this location to read the Air
Force's dummy report: http://www.af.mil/lib/roswell/

What doesn't seem fair to me is that afters years of research some of the
most respected ballon theorists like Karl Pflock, Robert Todd, Kal Korff and
others that came up with theories and conclusions that were grounded in
reality have been more or less pissed on by the Air Force's most current
report which is clearly a fictionalized account of a still highly
controversial incident. I'm speaking of people here that have done extensive
research, know the data, and are aware of witness accounts unlike the Richard
Weaver who appears to have forgotten what real research is. From what I have
heard so far the only researcher to support the ballon theory that endorsed
the Air Force's new story wholeheartedly was Phil Klass (surprise, surpise).
I still have yet to hear whether some of the other ballon buffs think about
the new Air Force report. I haven't seen a lot of back peddling nor have I
seen cries of support.

How have some of the ballon theorists reacted to the report?



Jared.