From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 14:29:32 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:29:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy Once Again
>Date: 17 Jul 97 09:36:52 EDT
>From: BOB SHELL <76750.2717@CompuServe.COM>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Alien Autopsy Once Again
>>From: Vince_Johnson_at_TENSOR__HSTN@ccmailsmtp.hstn.expl.pgs.com
>>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 97 17:40:24 cst
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Alien Autopsy Once Again
>>Have you actually examined any film (as opposed to video) showing the
>>image of the "alien"?
>>It's a simple (but fundamental) question, Bob. Yes or no?
>How about that gray area between yes and no? Not all questions
>have such simple, black or white, answers.
>>If not, how can you as a photo expert continue to make the categorical
>>assertion that the AA "film" is not a "recently crafed fake?"
>Vince, in case it has not occurred to you, I can do anything I damned
>well want. I don't need your permission, approval, support, etc. In
>fact, frankly I don't give a damn about you or what you think.
>If you really want to know how and why I reach my conclusions, then
>attend one of the talks I give, get the video, or read my forthcoming
>magazine article.
>Otherwise, in the immortal words of W.C. Fields, "Go away, kid, you
>bother me."
>Bob
===========================================================================
Just two cents, please!
Not fair Bob! I've had a few head butting sessions with Vince myself, but
it's always been taken in the spirit of "constructive arguement" and
hopefully is a dialog that is informative/enlightening for the reader.
(Even if the dialog does nothing more than reveal the nature and character
of the writer! <G>)
Vince has a "balls to the wall" way of asking his questions I'll grant you
that, but the "kid" as you so disrespectfully refer to him is asking an
honest and valid question. He (we, those of us who follow these threads)
deserve an answer.
We all use this venue to express ourselves, give and recieve information
and viewpoints, and simply to share the offering that we bring to the
table. I have always felt that answering 'tough questions' (often times
couched in tough language) for folks I sometimes didn't even like, is a
good way to (put back in/pay back) for the fun and priveledge
of being published on this list. Not a huge price.
Vince just wants to know if you've actually examined a piece of the
original film, or has it just been only video. By itself its not a "loaded"
question. It's one that I'd like to hear the answer to, just out of
curiosity. And, not because I have any vested interest in the final
outcome, but simply to know. I'm sure that many others are curious as well.
Another fun thing about this list is "getting it here first!" <EG>
So come on Bob, bring your ball back, we need it to play! You and Vince
make nice so we can all enjoy the dialog. Vince, tune down the "sphincter
factor" when you address Bob or request information from him. Bob, would
you _please_ (for all of us) answer Vinces interesting and _quite valid_
question?
In the spirit of learning,
tu amigo,
Juan Velez, Hijo de los OVNI's
John Velez
jvif@spacelab.net
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com