Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Re: Alien Autopsy Once Again

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Vince_Johnson_at_TENSOR__HSTN@ccmailsmtp.hstn.expl.pgs.com
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 97 14:05:30 cst
Fwd Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:40:17 -0400
Subject: Re: Alien Autopsy Once Again


>Date: 17 Jul 97 09:36:52 EDT
>From: BOB SHELL <76750.2717@CompuServe.COM>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Alien Autopsy Once Again

>>From: Vince_Johnson_at_TENSOR__HSTN@ccmailsmtp.hstn.expl.pgs.com
>>Date: Wed, 16 Jul 97 17:40:24 cst
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Alien Autopsy Once Again


>>Have you actually examined any film (as opposed to video) showing the
>>image of the "alien"?

>>It's a simple (but fundamental) question, Bob. Yes or no?

>How about that gray area between yes and no?  Not all questions
>have such simple, black or white, answers.

True, not all questions have black/white, yes/no answers. However,
Bob, there's not a whit of ambiguity about either my question or your
possible reply. Did you examine relevant frames or didn't you?

Your continued evasion of this simple fundamental question -- that
goes to the crux of your involvement in the AA scam -- can only
indicate that you have not personally examined a single frame of film
showing the "alien" image.

Although your credentials as a photo expert are unimpeachable, until
you can report that you have personally examined relevant frames from
the AA "film," your involvement in this affair is limited to being
either a shameless PR flack for Ray Santilli, and/or to promote your
own limited marketability due to your peripheral involvement in this
scam. There are no other explanations.

[You could lie, of course, and say that you had indeed examined the
film -- but that would eliminate the possibility of your weaseling-out
when the facts about this scam become known. Shucks, Bob, why bother?
Your reputation is already ruined. You'll never be taken seriously in
the field of ufology except among overcredulous rubes and nutbars.]


>>If not, how can you as a photo expert continue to make the categorical
>>assertion that the AA "film" is not a "recently crafted fake?"

>Vince, in case it has not occurred to you, I can do anything I damned
>well want.  I don't need your permission, approval, support, etc.  In
>fact, frankly I don't give a damn about you or what you think.

With responses like this, you apparently don't care what your fellow
UpDates subscribers think either.


>If you really want to know how and why I reach my conclusions, then
>attend one of the talks I give, get the video, or read my forthcoming
>magazine article.

Sure, I should waste my time on a "photo expert" offering "expert
opinion" on film he won't/can't confirm that he's actually seen.
Frankly, I find challenging your ridiculous BS to be much more
productive.


>Otherwise, in the immortal words of W.C. Fields, "Go away, kid, you
>bother me."

I suspect I do, Bob. At least I hope so.

Vince