UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: nick@emailme.at.address.below (Nick Humphries)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 22:28:40 GMT
Fwd Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 20:13:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Bursting the Balloon
>Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 05:20:13 +0200 (MET DST)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Henny van der Pluijm <hvdp@worldonline.nl>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Bursting the Balloon
>>From: Andromeda0@aol.com [Jared Anderson]
>>Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 05:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Bursting the Balloon
>>If anyone needs a good laugh they can goto this location to read the Air
>>Force's dummy report: http://www.af.mil/lib/roswell/
>>What doesn't seem fair to me is that afters years of research some of the
>>most respected ballon theorists like Karl Pflock, Robert Todd, Kal Korff and
>>others that came up with theories and conclusions that were grounded in
>>reality have been more or less pissed on by the Air Force's most current
>>report which is clearly a fictionalized account of a still highly
>>controversial incident.
Tell me if I've misunderstood anything, but didn't the USAF investigation
thought process go along the lines of "We've found nothing that could suggest
alien bodies in 1947, but our best guess is this dummies test in the 1950s.
Maybe people are mixing the Mogul crash with that, after all this case was
only investigated 25 years after the fact - memories are bound to be clouded."
I see nothing wrong with this way of thinking.
>>I'm speaking of people here that have done extensive
>>research, know the data, and are aware of witness accounts unlike the Richard
>>Weaver who appears to have forgotten what real research is. From what I have
>>heard so far the only researcher to support the ballon theory that endorsed
>>the Air Force's new story wholeheartedly was Phil Klass (surprise, surpise).
This is the same Phillip Klass who advised _against_ releasing the report
because it didn't completely solve the mystery?
>If that is so, then I don't see why anyone is still taking this guy
>seriously. Is Phil Klass getting senile already or is that label only
>allowed to be used on the hundreds or Roswell witnesses that
>are senile according to Klass?
Klass is extreme, not senile, and on this point you appear to be misguided.
Nick Humphries, nickh@the-den.clara.net, at your service
If the Truth is Out There, what's In Here?
*** NOTICE NEW E-MAIL - YOU SPAM, YOU DIE! ***
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com