Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: XianneKei@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 14:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
Fwd Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 09:49:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'

Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 09:40:00 -0400
To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'


> His interview with three cameramen was well done, but how many cameramen
>  did he actually interview, and what was there selection process.  Could he
>  perhaps have found three other cameramen with different views if his goal
>  had been to show that the "film" was real?  Several military cameramen
have
>  posted information to the "net" that would seem to support the validity of
>  the technique shown, and in the end all of Kent's statements of proof are
>  just as annecdotal as everthing else in this circus.

All good questions perhaps better answered by Kent Jeffrey and/or his
cameramen witnesses.

BTW, have you attempted to verify is any of these cameramen (Kent's or the
"net" ones) were indeed real cameramen?

To the best of my knowledge Kent called the cameramen's association (don't
remember the name of the organization but it is in his SCAM article) and was
given names/phone #'s of three people: Longo, Gibson and McGovern. I think
the first 3 he spoke to gave him all the same (or nearly the same answers)
but to be sure I would recommend that you contact Kent for the additional
and/or correct details. How many should he have interviewed?

It's easy to criticize what we ourselves have not investigated. You have
proof that Kent's cameramen are incorrect? Present the evidence and confront
them but don't do it on the "net" until AFTER you have contacted the men with
whom you may disagree.

Rebecca