UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Peregrine Mendoza <101653.2205@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 18:46:39 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 10:03:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Nightwatch Online - Discussion with Velez
The Duke of Mendoza presents his compliments.
>Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 20:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@ucs.orst.edu>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Nightwatch Online - Discussion with Velez
[snip]
>The problem here is that if people in the limelight or with political
>or scientific responsibilities are abducted, they are not going to
>want to report it because they're smart enough to know they won't be
>believed by many, and would instead be ridiculed and be the butt of
>"little green men" jokes by other persons of responsibility or in
>power.
[snip]
>The key example others here will likely point to also is the very
>high official within the U.N. who was abducted.
Well, allegedly abducted. But suppose he was, indeed. He - the hapless
P.J. de Cuellar, sometime Secretary General of the UN - also denies it.
Now suppose he is denying it, and that it happened, but that he duly
took the aliens' and Linda's message to his bosom, and is now deeply
concerned about the fate of molluscs, fishes, &c.
Has anyone bothered to find out (a) what was de Cuellar's interest
in environmental matters before November 1989, and (b) whether he has
evinced any special interest or become more active in environmental
issues since?
If the answer to (a) is "low" and to (b) is "No he hasn't", then you
can expect yet another ufological cock ("it's all cock") fight to break out
between differing factions who conclude from this that on the one hand (i)
JPdeC wasn't abducted and on the other (ii) not even the
uncomfortable experience he underwent - being threatened with dead
fish and shouted at by the doughty Linda, etc - persuaded him of the
argument. [If so the aliens blew that one pretty thoroughly. In that
case I'd guess that those who hatched & botched the plan were ordered
to go into a time-warp back to 1947 and commit hari-kiri over the
New Mexico desert, with the distressing consequences we all know.
However, I digress.] But if (a) should be "low" and (b) should be "Yes
he has - enormously", then the promoters of the case have a little
circumstantial evidence on their side. Cue for more shouting, threats,
accusations of depravity, idle laughter from cheaper seats, &c.
It would still be interesting to know what the answers really are,
even if it would be somewhat unkind to ask why no one raised these
questions before.
Yours &c
Panjandrum D. Mendoza
"Haven't you noticed how UFOs are all shaped like fast food?"
--Reverend Transom K. Stoatwhistle, "The NWO and McSatan", 1991
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com