Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'/Roswell

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: BOB SHELL <76750.2717@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 23 Jul 97 14:34:19 EDT
Fwd Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 00:15:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'/Roswell

>Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 12:28:20 GMT
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Santilli Had Jeffrey 'Pegged'/Roswell Initiative
>From: "Roger R. Prokic" <rprokic@ibm.net>
>To: updates@globalserve.net


Roger,

I want to make it clear to you and others here that I do NOT
know Kent Jeffrey.  We played answering machine tag for a while
a year or more ago, but never managed to connect and talk.  So I
can't speak about Kent's character from any first-hand experience.

That being said, I was outraged when I saw his piece on the
Santilli film, and even more outraged that MUFON published it.  It
was quite clear that he had made up his mind, and then looked for
evidence to support his conclusion that the film could not possibly
be real because a humanoid which evolved on another planet could
not possibly look so much like us.  This is a ridiculous premise,
since we have no way of knowing how evolution really works.  It is
still a theory, and there are many holes in it even in explaining
what has come about on this planet.  We simply have no idea how
evolution would progress elsewhere, and therefore no _a priori_
reasons to dismiss the film on these grounds.  Additionally, even
if the film is real, we do not know that the being shown in it
is extraterrestrial in origin or evolution.

The problem with Kent's cameramen is that their statements do not
agree with published documents by Kodak and others from the appropriate
time period.  Simply put, they do not know what they are talking about
photographically.

Contrary to Rebecca's assertions, I see no need for me to speak
with purveyors of nonsense personally to refute their nonsense.
Nonsense is nonsense, regardless of the source. Speaking with the
source will not alter that.

Just as in your case, I don't know Kent, but I emphatically do not
trust him.  I do know Rebecca, and I think she is an honest truth
seeker, and I do not mistrust her motives.

Bob