UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@ucs.orst.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Fwd Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:34:05 -0400 Subject: Re: Phoenix Lights - 'Solved'? On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, UFO UpDates - Toronto wrote: > From: TotlResrch@aol.com [Kal Korff] > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 06:10:28 -0400 (EDT) > To: Updates@globalserve.net > Subject: Jim Dilettoso Loses Credibility: Phoenix Lights SOLVED! > > This article speaks for itself...rember, Jim Dilettoso is also > the same person who "authenticated" the infamous Eduard "Billy" > Meier hoax UFO photographs. Like his Meier analysis, it appears > that his Phoenix lights one (a cause celeb with Richard Hoagland > and Art Bell) is badly in error as well. There were no UFOs, > just military flares, as some of us suspected all along. > Air Guard unit sheds light on Valley's UFOs > Randy Reid/The Arizona Republic > "I had one too many UFO calls," says Guard Capt. Eileen Bienz. > > By Richard Ruelas > The Arizona Republic > > There's still the chance it was flying saucers bent on world domination, > but another explanation turned up Thursday for those eerie lights > spotted over Phoenix on March 13. > Turns out the Maryland Air National Guard was running an exercise called > Operation Snowbird along the Barry Goldwater Gunnery Range southwest of > Phoenix on that fabled night. .... > .... > A spokesman for Luke Air Force Base confirmed that the Maryland planes > were authorized to use the Barry Goldwater range from 9:30 to 10 p.m. on > March 13. ... > Bienz said the Snowbird planes don't explain away everything spotted > that night. The planes don't match up with reports of lights coming in > from the north, zooming through Phoenix and popping up again near > Kingman. But Bienz is trying to find the origin of those as well. > > But the Operation Snowbird planes might account for the lights seen near > 10 p.m. in the west, the sightings that have provided most of the > videotape and photographs seen around the country. Hello List, What the negative skeptic shouldn't forget is that it was the UFOs reported around 8:15 pm in the Prescott-Phoenix area that created all the excitement, and that have not been explained as man-made or natural objects. This was the very large triangular object, with various lights on its periphery, described at times as a V formation of lights. I suppose a two-hour time error doesn't matter much to someone who would dismiss a 7- or 10-year time discrepancy between witnesses to alien bodies and dropped dummies. But it should certainly matter to anyone who would wish to call himself a ufologist. Jim Deardorff
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com