From: Stig_Agermose@online.pol.dk (Stig Agermose)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 08:11:47 +0200
Fwd Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 12:42:32 -0400
Subject: Roswellian 'Unearthly' Silicon Scoffed At By
>From The Albuquerque Journal, July 25 1997:
http://www.abqjournal.com/roswell/1ros7-25.htm
Date of publication:
Friday, 25-Jul-97 11:25:52 MDT
=20
Scientists Scoff at Chunk of Roswellian 'Unearthly' Silicon
By John Fleck=20
Journal Staff Writer=20
A chunk of silicon touted earlier this month as unearthly scientific
proof that a UFO crashed near Roswell 50 years ago easily could have
been cooked up in any college chemistry lab, scientists say.=20
Even the scientist who made the original out-of-this-world claim at a
July 4 Roswell news conference that the material couldn't have been
made on Earth now acknowledges the evidence is "inconclusive."=20
"In retrospect, with 20/20 hindsight, I would have been a little more
careful with my language," said San Diego chemist Russell VernonClark
in a telephone interview Thursday.=20
During the frenzied 50th anniversary celebrations of an alleged alien
crash in New Mexico, VernonClark stood on a stage and said of the
fragment of silicon: "It is impossible for it to be from Earth."=20
It was one of the most remarkable events during the 50th anniversary
celebration, which drew thousands of people who paraded in strange
costumes and bought large quantities of UFO paraphernalia.=20
But in the weeks since, VernonClark's work has been subjected to a
withering critique by other scientists.=20
In the interview Thursday, he said he should have acknowledged during
the news conference the possibility the material could have been
manufactured on Earth.=20
Scientists studying VernonClark's data, which the chemist published on
the Internet, point to serious flaws.=20
"There's just a number of huge mistakes in that report, holes big
enough to run a dump truck through," said Albuquerque physicist Dave
Thomas.=20
Among the problems: VernonClark's claim that the alleged 50-year-old
spacecraft debris contained detectable amounts of the element
germanium-75, a substance so radioactive scientists say it would decay
into other elements in less than a day.=20
But even looking beyond the alleged flaws in the data, the scientists
say the claim the material must be extraterrestrial because of its
unusual characteristics doesn't hold up.=20
The ingredients to make it could be purchased from chemical supply
houses, they said, and easily mixed together in any university
chemistry lab.=20
"You could do it here," said University of Kentucky chemist Rob Toreki.=20
"There's no validity to what he's saying," Toreki said of VernonClark's
claim.=20
At the news conference, television producer Paul Davids, who produced a
fictional account of the alleged UFO crash near Roswell, told reporters
the material came from someone who claimed to have gotten it from the
1947 crash of an alien spacecraft near Roswell.=20
VernonClark, a chemist who works as an environmental health and safety
specialist in the chemistry laboratory at the University of California,
San Diego, said he was skeptical when he first got the sample.=20
But VernonClark said that when he tested it, he was surprised by the
results.=20
He sent it to a second, unidentified scientist for additional tests,
with similarly surprising results, he said.=20
VernonClark's evidence that the material is extraterrestrial is based
on an analysis of the types of silicon and other chemicals in the
object.=20
The atoms of a chemical such as silicon come in different types, called
"isotopes." The ratios of the different isotopes of naturally occurring
silicon on Earth provide a sort of fingerprint, and scientists believe
elements such as silicon formed in other parts of the galaxy would have
different isotopic fingerprints.=20
VernonClark said he and his unidentified colleague found isotopic
fingerprints in the mystery material that didn't match the fingerprint
of natural silicon on Earth.=20
The problem, Toreki explained, is that the isotopic fingerprint in
VernonClark's data would be relatively easy for a chemist to
manufacture.=20
For example, scientists can buy purified silicon of a number of
different isotopes from the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, said Sandia National Laboratories scientist Dick Coats.=20
All you need to make a material as "unearthly" as VernonClark's sample
is to mix up some of those Oak Ridge samples in a chemistry lab, Toreki
and Thomas said.=20
In the interview this week, VernonClark acknowledged he has no proof
the material is extraterrestrial, but said he still believes it's a
strong possibility.=20
Copyright =A9 1997 Albuquerque Journal=20
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com