Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Re: Bursting the Balloon

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: "Roger R. Prokic" <rprokic@ibm.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 23:20:23 GMT
Fwd Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 00:38:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Bursting the Balloon

>From: Ktperehwon@aol.com [Karl Pflock]
>Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 18:00:37 -0400 (EDT)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Bursting the Balloon

>before mid-1955.  Records may not have surfaced which prove what
>did "crash" at Roswell, but records most certainly have surfaced
>to show what did NOT crash at Roswell.  What did NOT crash at
>Roswell was an alien spaceship.  Twining's September 23, 1947,
>proves this. The companion study prepared by AF Intel at HQ USAF
>proves this.  The minutes of the USAF Scientific Advisory Board
>meeting of March 17-18, 1948,  prove this.  The early Nov. '48
>letter from AMC chief of technical intelligence Col. Howard McCoy
>to AF chief of intel MG Charles Cabell proves this.  So do a number
>of other documents from the same time period and later prove this.
>To any reasonable person, this is CONCLUSIVE proof of what the
>Roswell incident did NOT involve.  CASE CLOSED!

Karl,
Look at this possibility.  If ... Roswell really involved an
extraterrestrial space vehicle, do you expect minutes of a
released USAF Scientific Advisory Board or a letter from AMC
chief of technical intelligence Col. Howard McCoy to REALLY
say it was such?

So my point is that these documents,  because they are
released, doesn't PROVE it wasn't a crashed saucer.  As you
might recall, the military put the lid on Roswell with Gen.
Ramey's press conference.  Thus, any released information
after then could NEVER say it was a crashed saucer.
Especially since the GAO's efforts to find information
regarding this incident were fruitless.

In my opinion, you are mistaken when you say "CASE CLOSED!". <g>


Roger R. Prokic
Telecommunications Engineer
Lockheed Martin Astronautics
Denver, Colorado USA
- using a 3Com PalmPilot Professional & HandStamp Pro 1.0 -