Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1997 -> Jul -> Stan Friedman on Jeffrey....Part 2 of 3

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Dave Vetterick <veterick@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 21:59:32 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 09:06:08 -0400
Subject: Stan Friedman on Jeffrey....Part 2 of 3

Kent Jeffrey and Roswell
By Stanton T. Friedman
Part 2 of 3

Kent talks about conversations with B-29 pilots. Why would they
have had a need to know for info about crashed saucers? That
wouldn't help them be better bomber pilots. Again he insults them
by saying that if they knew or had known anything beyond what
was in the papers they would have told him. I should mention I
attended the 50th anniversary reunion of the 509th in Wendover,
Utah and another reunion in Roswell, and talked with loads of people
from the 509th. I was also very impressed with the men of the 509th.
Kent proclaims, "The most significant and dramatic event in recorded
history would surely have been discussed by these men". Security
doesn't work this way.  In the first place, no need to know. In the
second place, if they did know they would have known better than to
talk to anybody. Remember that Jesse Marcel was in Intelligence; Cavitt
and Rickett were in the Counter Intelligence Corps. None were pilots.

Kent denigrates Pappy Henderson. I spoke with his wife, with his
daughter, with his son, with his world War 2 Bombardier. He told
none of these people before seeing a newspaper article about the
crash after 1980. He did tell his good friend, Dentist John
Kromsohroeder, before the article appeared, but with his promise
on his honor as a former naval officer, he wouldn’t talk about it.
John didn't talk until after the Unsolved Mysteries broadcast
which included  Sappho Henderson. Pappy, after all, was entrusted
with flying VIP’s over the harbor in the Pacific after nuclear weapons
were detonated there during Operation Crossroads in 1946.

Kent rattles on about the high reliability of today's aircraft engines
implying that alien spacecraft would be much more reliable.  One would
think the only reason an airplane could crash was engine failure. Yet
Kent himself tells of an MD-88 that crashed because the flaps weren't
set properly. The Valujet and TWA 800 crashes didn't occur because
there was engine failure, but apparently because of unexpected events
having nothing to do with engine reliability. Landing gear have
collapsed on airplanes.  I hate to remind Kent, a professional pilot,
that occasionally pilots make errors too. Sometimes birds are ingested
into engines; no fault of the engine. Kent states the craft must be
capable
of interstellar flight. Why? There are many reports of huge mother ships
carrying smaller saucers.  Fighters attacking North Vietnam didn't fly
there directly from the USA on each mission. Many flew from aircraft
carriers located near the front.

Kent acts as though the debris found by Mac Brazel must have
been all there was. There have been aircraft accidents where an
engine was found many miles from the fuselage. I am convinced,
partly from the Eisenhower briefing, as delineated in “TOP
SECRET/MAJIC”, that alien bodies (NOT time shifted crash test
dummies) and other wreckage from inside the craft, were found just a
few miles from the debris field. Kent complains about nothing
exotic being found because he apparently thinks he knows all
about alien spacecraft construction. One of the things that Jesse
Marcel senior impressed upon me in 1978 was the LACK of anything
conventional.

Kent doesn't know, for example, what the outer hull (skin?) of an
alien vehicle would look like. How could indestructible material
be spread out? By an incredible explosion induced by a  lightning
bolt dumping a huge amount of energy into a magnetoaerodynamic
propulsion system. The steel left after the Oklahoma city bombing
was still very strong even though broken.  A radar beam known to
be on could have disrupted a propulsion or guidance system causing
a collision. After all 40% of the UFO sightings in the summer of 1947,
according to Bloecher, involved more than one vehicle. There is ample
evidence that another vehicle went down in the Plains of  San Augustin,
as described in “Crash at Corona”, having a gash in the outer hull like
two parentheses face to face. This is ignored totally by Kent and others
who, for whatever reason, do not want it to be  true.

Jesse Marcel spoke to Walter Haut about a piece of  the very strong
lightweight metal being rested on a rock with the other end on
the ground. A sledgehammer was applied with no dent; hardly
paper backed foil radar reflector easily torn by a 4 year old. And do
you REALLY believe you couldn’t dent a paper-backed foil lying on
the ground using a sledgehammer at will ?????

One of the worst things about Kent's article is that it employs
tunnel vision. What about the testimony of Bill Brazel, who found
strange wreckage himself? Of Judd Roberts the radio station man?
Of Elizabeth Tulk and Phyllis McGuire the sheriff's daughters?
Of Loretta Procter, of other ranchers? I spoke with all of these in
April. What about all the testimony relating to the Plains of San
Augustine crash and the easy proof that the NSA and CIA are
withholding UFO related information. Why does Kent act as
though flying disc and UFO mean the same thing? My lecture is
Flying Saucers are Real, NOT UFOs are real because only some UFOs
are flying saucers, though all flying saucers are UFOs.

====================Continued in Part 3 of 3======================